podusowski/walkers - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

slippy map (openstreetmap) widget for egui

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 60/100

External PR Merge Rate: 83%

Response Time: 7d

First Timer Success: 67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is podusowski/walkers welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

podusowski/walkers has a recorded first-timer success rate of 66.7%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in podusowski/walkers respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 170.9 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 59.9 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 59.9 places podusowski/walkers in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for podusowski/walkers?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for podusowski/walkers is 83.3%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in podusowski/walkers?

podusowski/walkers does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

podusowski
podusowski/walkersA•Welcoming287
GitHub
Back to Explorer
podusowski

podusowski/walkers

287
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(60/100)Rust

slippy map (openstreetmap) widget for egui

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.6/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Collaborative maintainer environment in podusowski/walkers. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
7 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
83.3%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
66.7%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
2 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
83.3%
Merge Gauge
66.7%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe53/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for podusowski/walkers
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/podusowski/walkers)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/podusowski/walkers?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (0)

View on GitHub

No cached good first issues currently tracked for podusowski/walkers.

View all good first issues directly on GitHub

Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for podusowski/walkers

When evaluating whether to contribute to podusowski/walkers, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of podusowski/walkers acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 7 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 83.3% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to podusowski/walkers

01

Is podusowski/walkers welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

podusowski/walkers has a recorded first-timer success rate of 66.7%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~7 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 59.9 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 59.9 places podusowski/walkers in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for podusowski/walkers?

The external pull request merge rate is 83.3%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in podusowski/walkers?

podusowski/walkers does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for podusowski/walkers are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.