podman-container-tools/podman - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Podman: A tool for managing OCI containers and pods.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 69/100

External PR Merge Rate: 64%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is podman-container-tools/podman welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

podman-container-tools/podman has a recorded first-timer success rate of 55.2%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in podman-container-tools/podman respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 68.7 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 68.7 places podman-container-tools/podman in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for podman-container-tools/podman?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for podman-container-tools/podman is 64.5%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in podman-container-tools/podman?

podman-container-tools/podman currently has 5 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

podman-container-tools
podman-container-tools/podmanA•Welcoming33.0k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
podman-container-tools

podman-container-tools/podman

33,021
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(69/100)Go

Podman: A tool for managing OCI containers and pods.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
8.1/10
Patience Score
8.4/10
Nitpick Rate
30%

Highly welcoming maintainers in podman-container-tools/podman. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Follow maintainer feedback from recent PR reviews

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not ignore unresolved maintainer review comments
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
64.5%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
55.2%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
151 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
64.5%
Merge Gauge
55.2%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe42/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for podman-container-tools/podman
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/podman-container-tools/podman)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/podman-container-tools/podman?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

podman/cmd/podman/common/create.go Lines 758 to 772 in 7ea8b6c subgidnameFlagName := "subgidname" createFlags.StringVar( &cf.SubUIDName, subgidnameFlagName, "", "Name of range listed in /etc/subgid for use in user namespace", ) _ = cmd.RegisterFlagCompletionFunc(subgidnameFlagName, completion.AutocompleteSubgidName) subuidnameFlagName := "subuidname" createFlags.StringVar( &cf.SubGIDName, subuidnameFlagName, "",

📅 Opened Oct 2, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Feature request description The podman system hyperv-prep --status command currently only outputs human-readable text, requiring tools to parse stdout to extract structured information. Adding support for --format=json (or --json) would enable programmatic consumption of this data Suggest potential solution Add a --format=json flag (or --json) to output structured data: podman system hyperv-prep --status --format=json { "isGroupMember": true, "hasRegistryEntries": false, "status": "notApplied" } Have you considered any alternatives? No response Additional context No response

📅 Opened Sep 29, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

With podman 6 we dropped cgroupv2 support but we never removed the --cpu-rt-period and --cpu-rt-runtime cli options. As documented they only work on a cgroupsv1 system. It does not make sense to have options that cannot work anymore since running on cgroupv1 returns a hard error. However currently the options only print a warning not a hard error, so technically removing them would break whoever set them since they only saw a warning before. podman/pkg/specgen/generate/validate_linux.go Lines 55 to 65 in f1b80e5 if s.ResourceLimits.CPU != nil { cpu := s.ResourceLimits.CPU if cpu.RealtimePeriod != nil { warnings = append(warnings, "Realtime period not supported on cgroups V2 systems") cpu.RealtimePeriod = nil

📅 Opened Sep 10, 2026💬 5 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

I've confirmed the fix in 5.8.0 for #27414 but it only fixes the issue for podman run, not podman exec. In the latter case, an empty string is treated as nothing and the default "C-p,C-q" is used instead of disabling the detach sequence.

📅 Opened Mar 4, 2026💬 11 comments
Quality: 15/100Contribute

Feature request description Podman's journald log driver does not support --log-opt labels= (or the quadlet equivalent LogOpt=labels=). Docker's journald driver supports this option, causing it to promote the specified container label key/value pairs as structured fields directly into each journal entry. In Podman, passing labels via LogOpt= is silently ignored. Suggest potential solution When a container is started with --log-opt labels=<key1> (or the equivalent in a quadlet), the journald log driver should read the specified label keys from the container's label set and write their values as structured fields into each journal message sent to the journald socket, matching Docker's behavior. Have you considered any alternatives? LogOpt=tag= can write a custom value into SYSLOG_IDENTIFIER, but this overwrites the container's display name and only accepts a single value, making it unusable for grouping containers that belong to multiple logical groups simultaneously (see Additional con

📅 Opened Mar 3, 2026💬 8 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more Go beginner tasks?Explore Go GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for podman-container-tools/podman

When evaluating whether to contribute to podman-container-tools/podman, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of podman-container-tools/podman acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 64.5% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to podman-container-tools/podman

01

Is podman-container-tools/podman welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

podman-container-tools/podman has a recorded first-timer success rate of 55.2%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 68.7 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 68.7 places podman-container-tools/podman in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for podman-container-tools/podman?

The external pull request merge rate is 64.5%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in podman-container-tools/podman?

Yes, podman-container-tools/podman currently has 5 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for podman-container-tools/podman are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.