po4yka/RIPDPI - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Android tool for faster, unrestricted internet: bypass DPI on-device, connect to a VPN relay server you control, and diagnose what is blocking each connection. Powered by in-repo Rust native modules.

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 49/100

External PR Merge Rate: 74%

Response Time: 4d

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is po4yka/RIPDPI welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

po4yka/RIPDPI has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in po4yka/RIPDPI respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 104.3 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 49.3 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 49.3 places po4yka/RIPDPI in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for po4yka/RIPDPI?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for po4yka/RIPDPI is 73.7%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in po4yka/RIPDPI?

po4yka/RIPDPI does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

po4yka
po4yka/RIPDPIBSolid54
GitHub
Back to Explorer
po4yka

po4yka/RIPDPI

54
BSolid(49/100)Kotlin

Android tool for faster, unrestricted internet: bypass DPI on-device, connect to a VPN relay server you control, and diagnose what is blocking each connection. Powered by in-repo Rust native modules.

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Growing Kotlin project in po4yka/RIPDPI welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with Kotlin style conventions
  • Keep PRs scoped and well-documented

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • Do not break existing automated test suites
Response Velocity
4 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
73.7%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
CRITICAL BUS FACTOR
Single maintainer
No active GitHub maintainers found (may review internally on Gerrit or internal tools)
Diagnostic Health HUD
73.7%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe29/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for po4yka/RIPDPI
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/po4yka/RIPDPI)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/po4yka/RIPDPI?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (0)

View on GitHub

No cached good first issues currently tracked for po4yka/RIPDPI.

View all good first issues directly on GitHub

Looking for more Kotlin beginner tasks?Explore Kotlin GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for po4yka/RIPDPI

When evaluating whether to contribute to po4yka/RIPDPI, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of po4yka/RIPDPI acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 4 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 73.7% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to po4yka/RIPDPI

01

Is po4yka/RIPDPI welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

po4yka/RIPDPI has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~4 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 49.3 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 49.3 places po4yka/RIPDPI in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for po4yka/RIPDPI?

The external pull request merge rate is 73.7%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in po4yka/RIPDPI?

po4yka/RIPDPI does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for po4yka/RIPDPI are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.