plengauer/Thoth - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 66/100

External PR Merge Rate: 81%

Response Time: 11h

First Timer Success: 60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is plengauer/Thoth welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

plengauer/Thoth has a recorded first-timer success rate of 60.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in plengauer/Thoth respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 10.7 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 66.1 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 66.1 places plengauer/Thoth in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for plengauer/Thoth?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for plengauer/Thoth is 80.9%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in plengauer/Thoth?

plengauer/Thoth currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

plengauer
plengauer/ThothAWelcoming164
GitHub
Back to Explorer
plengauer

plengauer/Thoth

164
AWelcoming(66/100)Shell

Open-source repository analyzed with precision C-Rank telemetry.

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.7/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
30%

Collaborative maintainer environment in plengauer/Thoth. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
10 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
80.9%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
60.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
2 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
80.9%
Merge Gauge
60.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe72/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for plengauer/Thoth
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/plengauer/Thoth)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/plengauer/Thoth?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

Problem The first step of the generate job in .github/workflows/refresh_demos.yml picks which .deb to install: { if [ "$GITHUB_EVENT" = release ]; then cat "$GITHUB_EVENT_PATH"; else curl --header "Authorization: Bearer ${{ github.token }}" https://api.github.com/repos/"$GITHUB_REPOSITORY"/releases/latest; fi; } \ | jq -r '.assets[] | select(.name | endswith("_amd64.deb")) | .url' \ | xargs wget ... -O package.deb GITHUB_EVENT is not a GitHub Actions environment variable. The documented ones are GITHUB_EVENT_NAME (the event) and GITHUB_EVENT_PATH (the payload file). $GITHUB_EVENT expands to the empty string, [ "" = release ] is always false, and the else branch always wins. Consequence: the workflow never uses the assets of the release that triggered it. It always downloads /releases/latest. The then branch and $GITHUB_EVENT_PATH are dead code. Evidence Release v5.60.2 triggered run #87 at 2026-08-22 18:58Z. The README it generated in #4097 reports: "telemetry.sdk.version": "5.61.1

📅 Opened Aug 23, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Context The macOS support work in #3174 (and the follow-up PRs #3942–#3951) makes INSTALL.sh and the GitHub Action installer (actions/instrument/shared/install.sh) try Homebrew first on Darwin, then fall back to a tarball install if brew isn't present or the tap install fails: brew tap plengauer/opentelemetry-shell https://github.com/plengauer/Thoth brew install opentelemetry-shell That tap — plengauer/homebrew-opentelemetry-shell — doesn't exist yet, so today this always falls through to the tarball path. That's fine functionally (the tarball path is the one actually exercised by CI's macos-latest smoke test), but Homebrew is the more idiomatic macOS install experience and is worth having as the primary path eventually. What's already in place meta/homebrew/opentelemetry-shell.rb — a working formula. build-brew (in build.yml) already fills in its __VERSION__/__SHA256__ placeholders on every build and uploads the result as a homebrew-formula.<ref> artifact — it's just not pu

📅 Opened Aug 8, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more Shell beginner tasks?Explore Shell GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for plengauer/Thoth

When evaluating whether to contribute to plengauer/Thoth, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of plengauer/Thoth acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 10 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 80.9% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to plengauer/Thoth

01

Is plengauer/Thoth welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

plengauer/Thoth has a recorded first-timer success rate of 60.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~10 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 66.1 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 66.1 places plengauer/Thoth in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for plengauer/Thoth?

The external pull request merge rate is 80.9%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in plengauer/Thoth?

Yes, plengauer/Thoth currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for plengauer/Thoth are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.