plannotator/herdr-annotate - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Annotate terminal text, review documents and agent replies in Herdr, and send the feedback straight back to the agent.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 57/100

External PR Merge Rate: 81%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is plannotator/herdr-annotate welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

plannotator/herdr-annotate has a recorded first-timer success rate of 33.3%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in plannotator/herdr-annotate respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 56.8 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 56.8 places plannotator/herdr-annotate in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for plannotator/herdr-annotate?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for plannotator/herdr-annotate is 81.4%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in plannotator/herdr-annotate?

plannotator/herdr-annotate does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

plannotator
plannotator/herdr-annotateA•Welcoming650
GitHub
Back to Explorer
plannotator

plannotator/herdr-annotate

650
InactiveA•Welcoming(57/100)Rust

Annotate terminal text, review documents and agent replies in Herdr, and send the feedback straight back to the agent.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.7/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
30%

Collaborative maintainer environment in plannotator/herdr-annotate. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in plannotator/herdr-annotate focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Update docs or README when behavior changes
  • •Add or update tests for changed behavior before requesting review
  • •Keep PRs small and focused on one change

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not ship user-facing changes without matching docs
  • •Do not leave requested test coverage unresolved
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors with feature work
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
81.4%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
33.3%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
2 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
81.4%
Merge Gauge
33.3%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe43/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for plannotator/herdr-annotate
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/plannotator/herdr-annotate)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/plannotator/herdr-annotate?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

Problem Annotations retain useful source information such as the workspace, tab, and pane. However, when reviewing an annotation later, there is no quick way to return to the exact location in the original Herdr session where the annotated text appeared. This is especially inconvenient for long-running or multiple sessions: the copied text alone may not provide enough surrounding context, and manually locating it in the session history can be difficult. Proposed behavior Add an action in the annotation manager that navigates from the selected annotation to its original location in the Herdr session transcript/scrollback. For example: Open the annotation manager. Select an annotation. Press Enter to focus the original workspace, tab, and pane. Scroll the session to the captured text and bring it into view. The annotation could store a stable session/location reference at capture time, such as a session ID together with a scrollback or message anchor, depending on what Herdr exposes. G

📅 Opened Aug 27, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 50/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for plannotator/herdr-annotate

When evaluating whether to contribute to plannotator/herdr-annotate, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of plannotator/herdr-annotate acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 81.4% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to plannotator/herdr-annotate

01

Is plannotator/herdr-annotate welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

plannotator/herdr-annotate has a recorded first-timer success rate of 33.3%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 56.8 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 56.8 places plannotator/herdr-annotate in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for plannotator/herdr-annotate?

The external pull request merge rate is 81.4%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in plannotator/herdr-annotate?

plannotator/herdr-annotate does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for plannotator/herdr-annotate are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.