pion/stun - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

A Go implementation of STUN

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 42/100

External PR Merge Rate: 67%

Response Time: 19d

First Timer Success: 67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is pion/stun welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

pion/stun has a recorded first-timer success rate of 66.7%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in pion/stun respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 451.3 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 41.7 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 41.7 places pion/stun in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for pion/stun?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for pion/stun is 66.7%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in pion/stun?

pion/stun does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

pion
pion/stunBSolid851
GitHub
Back to Explorer
pion

pion/stun

851
BSolid(42/100)Go

A Go implementation of STUN

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Constructive Code Reviewer

Warmth Score
8.2/10
Patience Score
8.4/10
Nitpick Rate
22%

Balanced & professional review environment in pion/stun. Maintains strict focus on technical quality and test standards.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • Use conventional commit messages and clean branch names
  • Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
18 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
66.7%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
66.7%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
1 core
Single maintainer review bottleneck
Diagnostic Health HUD
66.7%
Merge Gauge
66.7%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe47/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for pion/stun
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/pion/stun)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/pion/stun?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (0)

View on GitHub

No cached good first issues currently tracked for pion/stun.

View all good first issues directly on GitHub

Looking for more Go beginner tasks?Explore Go GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for pion/stun

When evaluating whether to contribute to pion/stun, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of pion/stun acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 18 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 66.7% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to pion/stun

01

Is pion/stun welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

pion/stun has a recorded first-timer success rate of 66.7%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~18 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 41.7 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 41.7 places pion/stun in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for pion/stun?

The external pull request merge rate is 66.7%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in pion/stun?

pion/stun does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for pion/stun are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.