perber/leafwiki - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

LeafWiki - Self-hosted wiki. Single Go binary, SQLite, Markdown on disk. No external database required.

C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 73/100

External PR Merge Rate: 84%

Response Time: 1d

First Timer Success: 38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is perber/leafwiki welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

perber/leafwiki has a recorded first-timer success rate of 37.5%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in perber/leafwiki respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 26.7 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 73.3 C-Rank™ score (S Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 73.3 places perber/leafwiki in the S tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for perber/leafwiki?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for perber/leafwiki is 84.3%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in perber/leafwiki?

perber/leafwiki currently has 5 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

perber
perber/leafwikiS•Elite1.2k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
perber

perber/leafwiki

1,151
Active (30d)S•Elite(73/100)Go

LeafWiki - Self-hosted wiki. Single Go binary, SQLite, Markdown on disk. No external database required.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
9.2/10
Patience Score
9.0/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Highly welcoming maintainers in perber/leafwiki. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
1 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
84.3%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
37.5%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
14 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
84.3%
Merge Gauge
37.5%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe55/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for perber/leafwiki
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/perber/leafwiki)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/perber/leafwiki?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Use case I'd like to host a wiki on an old low-consumption machine, it is running with an Intel Atom N270 @ 1.60 GHz (2 threads, i686, 32-bit only, PAE). It runs on Alpine Linux, 32b like a charm 🧚🏼 LeafWiki is portable (single binary), memory-efficient and leightweight, so it's the perfect candidate to run on this machine, unfortunately the release does not ship with any compatible binary Proposed behavior Can you add in ci cross-compiling for x86 (specifically i686 or IA-32) for the next releases?

📅 Opened Oct 3, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Bug Report What happened? Version Version v0.13.0 Platform Desktop Web Mobile Web Browser Chrome Firefox Safari Edge Other (please specify): Vivaldi (Chromium) Client OS Windows MacOS Linux iOS Android Other (please specify): Server OS Docker linux amd64 windows amd64 linux arm64 MacOS Steps to reproduce Open the asset (image) preview by double-click. Expected behavior The label will not be cut. Screenshots / recording One from my custom theme And one from original Possible fix Define the line-height for header (h2) element, in case with Tailwind CSS - replace the leading-* class, that is currently leading-none. I've set line-height: 1.2em; for a screenshot in "Expected behavior".

📅 Opened Oct 2, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Bug Report What happened? Submitting the Create Section form with the Enter key behaves differently from clicking the Create button. When I click Create, the section is created in the sidebar and I stay on the page I am currently viewing. When I press Enter while the section name field is focused, the section is created, but LeafWiki navigates to the newly created section/editor. Both submission methods should behave consistently. Version v0.13.0 Platform Desktop Web Mobile Web Running on Docker linux amd64 windows amd64 linux arm64 MacOS Steps to reproduce Open the sidebar and click Create Section. Enter a name for the new section. Press Enter to submit the form. Notice that the section is created and LeafWiki navigates to the new section/editor. Repeat the same process, but click the Create button instead of pressing Enter. Notice that the section is created, but the currently viewed page remains open. Expected behavior Submitting the form with Enter should behave the sa

📅 Opened Sep 15, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Bug Report What happened? The issue described here: #1378 is still an issue. Version This is (was) prevalent in versions: v0.12.1 & v0.13.0 Platform Desktop Web Mobile Web Running on Docker linux amd64 windows amd64 linux arm64 MacOS Steps to reproduce Using Safari Create a page that does not display 'on this page' Create a page that displays 'on this page' Navigate (back and forth) between these pages - observe the page/breadcrumb alignment This only occurs when the 'on this page' switches between being visible/hidden. At the point of the mis-alignment, when hovering over the 'favourites star', the page slides to align correctly. The mis-alignment does not occur when using the Chrome browser. Expected behaviour The breadcrumbs and the page margin should align vertically They should both be left-aligned (no left margin) On a desktop, always display the 'on this page' - even when it is empty (perhaps, hide it on a mobile, when it is empty) Screenshots / recording See: #13

📅 Opened Sep 8, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Problem / use case I would love to install it as a TrueNAS app (or rather HexOS app, which is built on TrueNAS). Any chance of that happening any time soon? Cheers!

📅 Opened Sep 2, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 75/100Contribute
Looking for more Go beginner tasks?Explore Go GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for perber/leafwiki

When evaluating whether to contribute to perber/leafwiki, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of perber/leafwiki acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 84.3% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to perber/leafwiki

01

Is perber/leafwiki welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

perber/leafwiki has a recorded first-timer success rate of 37.5%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 73.3 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 73.3 places perber/leafwiki in the Elite tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for perber/leafwiki?

The external pull request merge rate is 84.3%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in perber/leafwiki?

Yes, perber/leafwiki currently has 5 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for perber/leafwiki are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.