pablosnt/rekono - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Offensive security platform that automates attack surface discovery and vulnerability management

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 45/100

External PR Merge Rate: 86%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is pablosnt/rekono welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

pablosnt/rekono has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in pablosnt/rekono respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 44.5 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 44.5 places pablosnt/rekono in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for pablosnt/rekono?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for pablosnt/rekono is 85.7%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in pablosnt/rekono?

pablosnt/rekono does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

pablosnt
pablosnt/rekonoB•Solid527
GitHub
Back to Explorer
pablosnt

pablosnt/rekono

527
InactiveB•Solid(45/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)Python

Offensive security platform that automates attack surface discovery and vulnerability management

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Active maintainer team in pablosnt/rekono welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with repository style conventions
  • •Keep PRs focused and well-documented

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • •Do not break existing automated test suites
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
85.7%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
CRITICAL BUS FACTOR
Single maintainer
No active GitHub maintainers found (may review internally on Gerrit or internal tools)
Diagnostic Health HUD
85.7%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe34/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for pablosnt/rekono
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/pablosnt/rekono)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/pablosnt/rekono?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (0)

View on GitHub

No cached good first issues currently tracked for pablosnt/rekono.

View all good first issues directly on GitHub

Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for pablosnt/rekono

When evaluating whether to contribute to pablosnt/rekono, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of pablosnt/rekono acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 85.7% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to pablosnt/rekono

01

Is pablosnt/rekono welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

pablosnt/rekono has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 44.5 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 44.5 places pablosnt/rekono in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for pablosnt/rekono?

The external pull request merge rate is 85.7%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in pablosnt/rekono?

pablosnt/rekono does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for pablosnt/rekono are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.