p2panda/reflection - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Collaborative, local-first GTK text editor

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 58/100

External PR Merge Rate: 100%

Response Time: 1d

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is p2panda/reflection welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

p2panda/reflection has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in p2panda/reflection respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 24.9 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 57.9 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 57.9 places p2panda/reflection in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for p2panda/reflection?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for p2panda/reflection is 100.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in p2panda/reflection?

p2panda/reflection currently has 10 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

p2panda
p2panda/reflectionB•Solid348
GitHub
Back to Explorer
p2panda

p2panda/reflection

348
InactiveB•Solid(58/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)Capped at B (Bus Factor: 0)Rust

Collaborative, local-first GTK text editor

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Active maintainer team in p2panda/reflection welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with repository style conventions
  • •Keep PRs focused and well-documented

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • •Do not break existing automated test suites
Response Velocity
1 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
100.0%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
CRITICAL BUS FACTOR
Single maintainer
No active GitHub maintainers found (may review internally on Gerrit or internal tools)
Diagnostic Health HUD
100.0%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe81/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for p2panda/reflection
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/p2panda/reflection)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/p2panda/reflection?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

This entails two different kinds of export: In the primary menu on the overview, an option like "Export All Pads...", to get a folder with .md files for all your pads On each individual pad, the option to "Export to File...", to save the pad as a .md file

📅 Opened May 6, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 55/100Contribute

When taking notes there are a few autocomplete features that'd be really useful to have, in particular auto-completing new lines with the right prefix when writing lists of checkboxes. We already follow the indentation level of the previous lines for new lines, it'd be nice to do the same for bullet lists, ordered lists, and lists with checkboxes (Gitlab/Github do all of the above, I'd follow their behavior).

📅 Opened May 6, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

Ideally text lines should not be wider than about 70-100 characters. It'd be nice to do something similar to Apostrophe, and limit the maximum width independently of the window size.

📅 Opened May 6, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 55/100Contribute

When hovering other users' cursors, it'd be nice to show a tooltip with their name, and maybe their avatar as well.

📅 Opened May 6, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 55/100Contribute

When in a collaborative session with content that fills the entire height of the editor, it's annoying that there is no margin at the bottom, so that whatever is being typed is on the very last line, and any new lines appear beyond the viewport. To keep up to date I have to constantly scroll down. It would be nice to have some buffer to keep the next new lines in view.

📅 Opened Apr 9, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for p2panda/reflection

When evaluating whether to contribute to p2panda/reflection, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of p2panda/reflection acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 100.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to p2panda/reflection

01

Is p2panda/reflection welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

p2panda/reflection has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 57.9 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 57.9 places p2panda/reflection in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for p2panda/reflection?

The external pull request merge rate is 100.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in p2panda/reflection?

Yes, p2panda/reflection currently has 10 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for p2panda/reflection are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.