oximo-rs/oximo - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

A Rust algebraic modeling library for solving optimization problems.

C-Rank Grade: D (Risky) - 8/100

External PR Merge Rate: -

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is oximo-rs/oximo welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

oximo-rs/oximo has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked D typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in oximo-rs/oximo respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 7.5 C-Rank™ score (D Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 7.5 places oximo-rs/oximo in the D tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for oximo-rs/oximo?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for oximo-rs/oximo is 0.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in oximo-rs/oximo?

oximo-rs/oximo currently has 7 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

oximo-rs
oximo-rs/oximoD•Risky105
GitHub
Back to Explorer
oximo-rs

oximo-rs/oximo

105
InactiveD•Risky(8/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)Rust

A Rust algebraic modeling library for solving optimization problems.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.5/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Collaborative maintainer environment in oximo-rs/oximo. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in oximo-rs/oximo focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
0.0%
Selective PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
CRITICAL BUS FACTOR
Single maintainer
No active GitHub maintainers found (may review internally on Gerrit or internal tools)
Diagnostic Health HUD
0.0%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe0/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for oximo-rs/oximo
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/oximo-rs/oximo)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/oximo-rs/oximo?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. The error currently just reports the model kind. Describe the solution you'd like Improve the thiserror message to suggest which backends support that kind (e.g., "MILP is unsupported by Clarabel. Use HiGHS/Gurobi/MOSEK"). Additional context This issue is tagged good first issue specifically to help new contributors get hands-on with the codebase and wants to contribute in the long term. Please do not use AI for this issue.

📅 Opened Aug 23, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Currently, Clarabel doesn't support Paradiso KKT backends. Describe the solution you'd like Add pardiso variants to ClarabelDirectSolve gated on a new cargo feature. It should follow the existing faer gating pattern. Additional context This issue is tagged good first issue specifically to help new contributors get hands-on with the codebase and wants to contribute in the long term. Please do not use AI for this issue.

📅 Opened Aug 23, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Currently, we don't support rotated second-order cones. Describe the solution you'd like Extend SocConstraint/SocForm, detection, then translate into each supported backend. Additional context This issue is tagged good first issue specifically to help new contributors get hands-on with the codebase and wants to contribute in the long term. Please do not use AI for this issue.

📅 Opened Aug 23, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Currently, the LP reader rejects indicator/PWL sections with a generic error. Describe the solution you'd like Improve the UnsupportedLp error message (name the section + point to docs), document supported LP sections in the module docs, and add a test asserting the error for each unsupported keyword. Additional context This issue is tagged good first issue specifically to help new contributors get hands-on with the codebase and wants to contribute in the long term. Please do not use AI for this issue.

📅 Opened Aug 23, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Currently, the LP writer/reader doesn't have any round-trip tests. Describe the solution you'd like Build models covering senses/bounds/domains/objective names, write to LP string, read back, assert equivalence. Improves confidence in the reader without needing solvers. Additional context This issue is tagged good first issue specifically to help new contributors get hands-on with the codebase and wants to contribute in the long term. Please do not use AI for this issue.

📅 Opened Aug 23, 2026💬 7 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for oximo-rs/oximo

When evaluating whether to contribute to oximo-rs/oximo, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of oximo-rs/oximo acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 0.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to oximo-rs/oximo

01

Is oximo-rs/oximo welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

oximo-rs/oximo has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Risky typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 7.5 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 7.5 places oximo-rs/oximo in the Risky tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for oximo-rs/oximo?

The external pull request merge rate is 0.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in oximo-rs/oximo?

Yes, oximo-rs/oximo currently has 7 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for oximo-rs/oximo are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.