Is ovh/cds welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?
ovh/cds has a recorded first-timer success rate of 60.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.
AI Maintainer Review Guidelines
Review Persona
Empathetic Technical Mentor
Warmth Score
7.5/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%
Collaborative maintainer environment in ovh/cds. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.
What Contributors Actually Say
Discussions in ovh/cds focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.
Hidden Friction Signals
Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.
Unwritten Rules
- •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
- •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
- •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.
Top PR Submission Do's
- •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
- •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
- •Include context and link to the related issue
Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)
- •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
- •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
- •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
13 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle
Average Response Latency
Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.
Merge Efficiency
55.8%
Moderate PR acceptance rate
External Acceptance Rate
Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.
First-Timer Success
60.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate
First PR Conversion
Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.
Active Maintainers
3 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
55.8%
Merge Gauge
60.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe40/100
Embed C-Rank Badge
Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.
[](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/ovh/cds?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)
90-Day C-Rank Trajectory
5 snapshotsHistorical health & responsiveness evolution
58.8/100A
Oct 1
+50.8
Aug 19Range: 8.0 – 61.5 ptsOct 1
PR Acceptance & Review Speed Forecast
Precomputed via Live PR Events
Overall Merge Odds
55.8%
External PR acceptance
First-Timer Rate
60.0%
First PR success rate
Median Response (p50)
313h
50% receive response in
Tail Latency (p90)
N/A
90% receive response in
Active Maintainers: 3
Optimal PR Submission Window
Maintainer review activity heatmap & prime window prediction
Wednesday - FridayConfidence: 60%
Peak Review Hour
14:00 UTC
Calculating local time...
Primary Window
12:00 - 16:00 UTC
Calculating local time...
Active Maintainers
5 Tracked
Detected: UTC
24-Hour Maintainer Activity Heatmap (UTC)
LowPeak
00:0006:0012:0018:0023:00
Maintainers are most responsive around 14:00 UTC (14:00 UTC in your timezone). Recommended submission window is Wednesday - Friday from 12:00 to 16:00 UTC (12:00 - 16:00 UTC local).
PR Size vs Review Speed
Best Pull Request Size for ovh/cds
Sweet Spot: < 150 lines
Small (<150 LOC)Recommended
8.5davg review
70% Merge Approval
Medium (150–500 LOC)Normal
19.6davg review
53% Merge Approval
Large (>500 LOC)Slow
62.6davg review
25% Merge Approval
Maintainer Strategy: Maintainer Sweet Spot: PRs under 150 lines merge in ~203 hours (70% approval). Large PRs (>500 lines) take ~1502 hours (25% approval). Keep your diff compact for rapid review.
Active Good First Issues (0)
No cached good first issues currently tracked for ovh/cds.
Looking for more Go beginner tasks?Explore Go GFI
Contributor Community Vibe Feedback
Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.
Have you contributed to this repo?
Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness
Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for ovh/cds
When evaluating whether to contribute to ovh/cds, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.
Currently, maintainers of ovh/cds acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 13 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 55.8% were successfully merged into the primary branch.
Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to ovh/cds
01
Is ovh/cds welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?
ovh/cds has a recorded first-timer success rate of 60.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.
02
How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?
The initial maintainer response time averages ~13 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.
03
What does the 53.9 C-Rank™ score represent?
The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 53.9 places ovh/cds in the Solid tier.
04
What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for ovh/cds?
The external pull request merge rate is 55.8%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.
05
Are there beginner Good First Issues open in ovh/cds?
ovh/cds does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.
GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard
All metrics displayed for ovh/cds are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.