oppia/oppia-android - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

A free online & offline learning platform to make quality education accessible for all.

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 48/100

External PR Merge Rate: 50%

Response Time: 2d

First Timer Success: 22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is oppia/oppia-android welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

oppia/oppia-android has a recorded first-timer success rate of 22.2%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in oppia/oppia-android respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 49.8 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 47.6 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 47.6 places oppia/oppia-android in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for oppia/oppia-android?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for oppia/oppia-android is 49.6%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in oppia/oppia-android?

oppia/oppia-android currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

oppia
oppia/oppia-androidBSolid407
GitHub
Back to Explorer
oppia

oppia/oppia-android

407
BSolid(48/100)Kotlin

A free online & offline learning platform to make quality education accessible for all.

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Quality Architect

Warmth Score
6.8/10
Patience Score
7.3/10
Nitpick Rate
41%

Rigorous architecture standards (62% critical review signals). Ensure PRs strictly follow guidelines before requesting review in oppia/oppia-android.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
2 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
49.6%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
22.2%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
19 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
49.6%
Merge Gauge
22.2%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe27/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for oppia/oppia-android
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/oppia/oppia-android)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/oppia/oppia-android?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (3)

View on GitHub

Describe the bug When trying to build a release locally recently, I ran into a situation where my AAB ended up being assembled with negative version codes (per #6265). Steps To Reproduce Check out a shallow copy of Oppia Android. Try to build a release. Use bundletool to observe the version codes. Observe negative version codes. Expected Behavior Version codes should never be negative. In this case it's unavoidable since a shallow copy of the repository will have the wrong commit count on develop, however we should just have TransformAndroidManifest outright fail in these cases. Screenshots/Videos No response What device/emulator are you using? No response Which Android version is your device/emulator running? No response Which version of the Oppia Android app are you using? No response Additional Context No response

📅 Opened Jul 11, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Describe the bug Since #6268 was merged, coderabbit is now enabled for opt-in reviews. However, coderabbit is a bit over-eager and announces itself for every PR. This adds a lot of email overhead for PRs, and seems largely unnecessary (and a bit spammy). Steps To Reproduce Create any PR and observe that coderabbit automatically posts a comment that it's disabled but can be used with the coderabbit review command. Expected Behavior It would be preferred if coderabbit didn't announce itself at all. This should be configurable using coderabbit settings. Screenshots/Videos No response What device/emulator are you using? No response Which Android version is your device/emulator running? No response Which version of the Oppia Android app are you using? No response Additional Context No response

📅 Opened Jun 25, 2026💬 9 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. scripts/static_checks.sh is the local "run all checks" convenience script. However, when an individual check fails (e.g., ktlint_lint_check.sh exits with code 1), the outer script currently continues running the next check and ultimately exits with the status of the last command, not the first failure. This means a developer could see "finished" at the end while a check in the middle silently failed. The fix is to track failures across all checks and exit with a non-zero code if any of them failed, matching CI behavior. Describe the solution you'd like Update scripts/static_checks.sh to track failures across all checks and exit with a non-zero code if any of them failed, while still running all checks to completion (not bailing on the first failure). Concretely: Add a FAILURES=0 counter at the top of the script. After each check invocation, append || FAILURES=$((FAILURES+1)) to capture failures without stopping execution.

📅 Opened May 22, 2026💬 7 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute
Looking for more Kotlin beginner tasks?Explore Kotlin GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for oppia/oppia-android

When evaluating whether to contribute to oppia/oppia-android, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of oppia/oppia-android acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 2 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 49.6% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to oppia/oppia-android

01

Is oppia/oppia-android welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

oppia/oppia-android has a recorded first-timer success rate of 22.2%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~2 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 47.6 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 47.6 places oppia/oppia-android in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for oppia/oppia-android?

The external pull request merge rate is 49.6%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in oppia/oppia-android?

Yes, oppia/oppia-android currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for oppia/oppia-android are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.