openzim/gutenberg - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Scraper for downloading the entire ebooks repository of project Gutenberg

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 57/100

External PR Merge Rate: 56%

Response Time: 9h

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is openzim/gutenberg welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

openzim/gutenberg has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in openzim/gutenberg respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 9.4 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 56.9 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 56.9 places openzim/gutenberg in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for openzim/gutenberg?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for openzim/gutenberg is 56.3%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in openzim/gutenberg?

openzim/gutenberg does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

openzim
openzim/gutenbergA•Welcoming168
GitHub
Back to Explorer
openzim

openzim/gutenberg

168
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(57/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)Python

Scraper for downloading the entire ebooks repository of project Gutenberg

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
8.8/10
Patience Score
8.8/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Highly welcoming maintainers in openzim/gutenberg. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in openzim/gutenberg focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Update docs or README when behavior changes
  • •Link the issue and include reproduction context in the PR
  • •Add or update tests for changed behavior before requesting review

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not ship user-facing changes without matching docs
  • •Do not open context-free PRs
  • •Do not leave requested test coverage unresolved
Response Velocity
9 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
56.3%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
8 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
56.3%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe45/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for openzim/gutenberg
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/openzim/gutenberg)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/openzim/gutenberg?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (3)

View on GitHub

Add the number of books the author has in current archive, to avoid clicking on the name only to realize the author has only one book... kinda deceiving ^^ Use same colors than number of books on shelves: (without #592 obviously)

📅 Opened Sep 22, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 75/100Contribute

In the left part of the shelves display, We have a very small glitch: The underline is covering the space where we would like to have no underline on the space: Clearly a very small visual glitch, but since we saw it, I fill the issue

📅 Opened Sep 22, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 75/100Contribute

As the architecture has grown up with time we added another source ingestion which is open textbook library (OTL). With this architecture it has become easier to add a new source ingestion, for example here's a new candidate #527. We need clear instructions how to add another source to the architecture in the same manner how OTL was added. See #525 for reference and how to connect a new ingestion while using all the core engine resources whatever it exposes, those core engine methods should be described properly. It should contain clear instructions, as in how and where to derive CLI args, image optimization, use of concurrency, adding new source-agnostic keys (works or collection) in en.json and qqq.json locales, or whatever resource there is to use for us, while not touching core engine unless there is still anything left coupled to the source.

📅 Opened Aug 31, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for openzim/gutenberg

When evaluating whether to contribute to openzim/gutenberg, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of openzim/gutenberg acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 9 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 56.3% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to openzim/gutenberg

01

Is openzim/gutenberg welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

openzim/gutenberg has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~9 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 56.9 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 56.9 places openzim/gutenberg in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for openzim/gutenberg?

The external pull request merge rate is 56.3%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in openzim/gutenberg?

openzim/gutenberg does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for openzim/gutenberg are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.