openworm/OpenWorm - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Repository for the main Dockerfile with the OpenWorm software stack and project-wide issues

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 44/100

External PR Merge Rate: 56%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is openworm/OpenWorm welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

openworm/OpenWorm has a recorded first-timer success rate of 66.7%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in openworm/OpenWorm respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 44.4 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 44.4 places openworm/OpenWorm in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for openworm/OpenWorm?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for openworm/OpenWorm is 56.3%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in openworm/OpenWorm?

openworm/OpenWorm does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

openworm
openworm/OpenWormBSolid3.0k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
openworm

openworm/OpenWorm

3,025
BSolid(44/100)Python

Repository for the main Dockerfile with the OpenWorm software stack and project-wide issues

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Active Python repository in openworm/OpenWorm with ongoing community development and issue triage.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with Python style conventions
  • Keep PRs scoped and well-documented

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • Do not break existing automated test suites
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
56.3%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
66.7%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
CRITICAL BUS FACTOR
Single maintainer
No active GitHub maintainers found (may review internally on Gerrit or internal tools)
Diagnostic Health HUD
56.3%
Merge Gauge
66.7%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe43/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for openworm/OpenWorm
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/openworm/OpenWorm)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/openworm/OpenWorm?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (0)

View on GitHub

No cached good first issues currently tracked for openworm/OpenWorm.

View all good first issues directly on GitHub

Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for openworm/OpenWorm

When evaluating whether to contribute to openworm/OpenWorm, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of openworm/OpenWorm acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 56.3% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to openworm/OpenWorm

01

Is openworm/OpenWorm welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

openworm/OpenWorm has a recorded first-timer success rate of 66.7%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 44.4 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 44.4 places openworm/OpenWorm in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for openworm/OpenWorm?

The external pull request merge rate is 56.3%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in openworm/OpenWorm?

openworm/OpenWorm does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for openworm/OpenWorm are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.