open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

OpenTelemetry Collector

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 57/100

External PR Merge Rate: 49%

Response Time: 2d

First Timer Success: 34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector has a recorded first-timer success rate of 34.4%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 38.3 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 56.8 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 56.8 places open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector is 48.6%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector?

open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

open-telemetry
open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collectorA•Welcoming7.6k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
open-telemetry

open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector

7,605
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(57/100)Go

OpenTelemetry Collector

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Constructive Code Reviewer

Warmth Score
7.4/10
Patience Score
7.8/10
Nitpick Rate
33%

Balanced & professional review environment in open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector. Maintains strict focus on technical quality and test standards.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
1 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
48.6%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
34.4%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
82 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
48.6%
Merge Gauge
34.4%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe31/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

Component(s) No response Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. The Collector's log level is configured globally via service::telemetry::logs::level, which applies uniformly to every component. There is no way to adjust the log verbosity of a single component without affecting all others. This becomes a problem for resource-intensive components like the ebpf-profiler receiver, where enabling debug logging is essential for troubleshooting but doing so at the service level floods the output with noise from every other component in the pipeline. The ebpf-profiler is actively working around this limitation by introducing component-specific configurations like verbose_mode (opentelemetry-ebpf-profiler#1317), but this forces each component to reinvent its own log level control rather than relying on a collector-level mechanism. See opentelemetry-ebpf-profiler#417 for the broader discussion. Describe the solution you'd like Allow users to override the log level for ind

📅 Opened Apr 2, 2026💬 13 comments
Quality: 45/100Contribute

Component(s) No response Describe the issue you're reporting We should ensure, with a CI step, that templates are properly tab-formatted, even before running gofmt in the generated code. Related: #14669 #14688 #14697 Tip React with 👍 to help prioritize this issue. Please use comments to provide useful context, avoiding +1 or me too, to help us triage it. Learn more here.

📅 Opened Mar 4, 2026💬 9 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more Go beginner tasks?Explore Go GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector

When evaluating whether to contribute to open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 48.6% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector

01

Is open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector has a recorded first-timer success rate of 34.4%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 56.8 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 56.8 places open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector?

The external pull request merge rate is 48.6%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector?

Yes, open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.