open-quantum-safe/oqs-provider - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

OpenSSL 3+ provider containing post-quantum algorithms

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 47/100

External PR Merge Rate: 50%

Response Time: 10h

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is open-quantum-safe/oqs-provider welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

open-quantum-safe/oqs-provider has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in open-quantum-safe/oqs-provider respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 9.5 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 47.2 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 47.2 places open-quantum-safe/oqs-provider in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for open-quantum-safe/oqs-provider?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for open-quantum-safe/oqs-provider is 50.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in open-quantum-safe/oqs-provider?

open-quantum-safe/oqs-provider currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

open-quantum-safe
open-quantum-safe/oqs-providerB•Solid499
GitHub
Back to Explorer
open-quantum-safe

open-quantum-safe/oqs-provider

499
InactiveB•Solid(47/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)C

OpenSSL 3+ provider containing post-quantum algorithms

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.5/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Collaborative maintainer environment in open-quantum-safe/oqs-provider. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in open-quantum-safe/oqs-provider focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
9 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
50.0%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
1 core
Single maintainer review bottleneck
Diagnostic Health HUD
50.0%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe43/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for open-quantum-safe/oqs-provider
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/open-quantum-safe/oqs-provider)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/open-quantum-safe/oqs-provider?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

CI jobs differ a lot between platforms. This issue is to sync what gets tested by the CI jobs on each platform.

📅 Opened Aug 2, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 75/100Contribute

When building oqs-provider against current "master" OpenSSL branch (openssl 4.1.0-dev), the following build deprecation notices appear: oqsprov_keys.c: In function ‘oqsx_key_from_pkcs8’: oqsprov_keys.c:1028:9: warning: ‘ASN1_STRING_length’ is deprecated: Since OpenSSL 4.1; Use ASN1_STRING_length_ex() instead. [-Wdeprecated-declarations] 1028 | plen = ASN1_STRING_length(oct); | ^~~~ In file included from include/openssl/objects.h:21, from include/openssl/evp.h:48, from oqsprov_keys.c:14: openssl/asn1.h:794:5: note: declared here 794 | int ASN1_STRING_length(const ASN1_STRING *x); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ [ 10%] Building C object oqsprov/CMakeFiles/oqsprovider.dir/oqs_kmgmt.c.o [ 12%] Building C object oqsprov/CMakeFiles/oqsprovider.dir/oqs_sig.c.o [ 15%] Building C object oqsprov/CMakeFiles/oqsprovider.dir/oqs_kem.c.o [ 17%] Building C object oqsprov/CMakeFiles/oqsprovider.dir/oqs_encode_key2any.c.o oqs_encode_key2

📅 Opened Jul 21, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute
Looking for more C beginner tasks?Explore C GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for open-quantum-safe/oqs-provider

When evaluating whether to contribute to open-quantum-safe/oqs-provider, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of open-quantum-safe/oqs-provider acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 9 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 50.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to open-quantum-safe/oqs-provider

01

Is open-quantum-safe/oqs-provider welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

open-quantum-safe/oqs-provider has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~9 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 47.2 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 47.2 places open-quantum-safe/oqs-provider in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for open-quantum-safe/oqs-provider?

The external pull request merge rate is 50.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in open-quantum-safe/oqs-provider?

Yes, open-quantum-safe/oqs-provider currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for open-quantum-safe/oqs-provider are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.