ooolabdev/ooosplat - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

A local desktop app that turns videos and images into 3D Gaussian Splats in one click.

C-Rank Grade: D (Risky) - 13/100

External PR Merge Rate: -

Response Time: 9d

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is ooolabdev/ooosplat welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

ooolabdev/ooosplat has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked D typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in ooolabdev/ooosplat respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 213.4 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 13.4 C-Rank™ score (D Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 13.4 places ooolabdev/ooosplat in the D tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for ooolabdev/ooosplat?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for ooolabdev/ooosplat is 0.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in ooolabdev/ooosplat?

ooolabdev/ooosplat does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

ooolabdev
ooolabdev/ooosplatD•Risky1.9k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
ooolabdev

ooolabdev/ooosplat

1,880
InactiveD•Risky(13/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)Rust

A local desktop app that turns videos and images into 3D Gaussian Splats in one click.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.5/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Collaborative maintainer environment in ooolabdev/ooosplat. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in ooolabdev/ooosplat focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
8 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
0.0%
Selective PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
1 core
Single maintainer review bottleneck
Diagnostic Health HUD
0.0%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe0/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for ooolabdev/ooosplat
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/ooolabdev/ooosplat)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/ooolabdev/ooosplat?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

## 概述 对 `0.2.0` 做了一轮静态走查,发现 5 处值得修复的缺陷,按影响排序。全部可在本地复现或由代码逻辑直接推出。 --- ### 1. PLY 头解析脆弱,可能在训练完成后误判产物无效(最高优先级) `src-tauri/src/reconstruction/ply.rs:18-21` ```rust let mut bytes = vec![0_u8; (size.min(256 * 1024)) as usize]; let read = file.read(&mut bytes)?; Read::read 允许短读,返回少于 256KB 也合法。此时 end_header 可能落在未读区域,报错「PLY 缺少 end_header」。失败点在 Brush 训练完成之后,用户损失最大。 ply.rs:37-49 属性校验用 line.ends_with(" x"),但 header.lines() 会保留 CRLF 的 \r,CRLF 头必然匹配失败,报「PLY 缺少 Gaussian 属性」。而同函数 :26 又显式接受 ply\r\n,逻辑自相矛盾。 建议:改用 file.take(n).read_to_end(&mut bytes);所有头行统一 trim_end() 后再比较。 2. 失败/取消时进度条跳到 100%,时间线全部

📅 Opened Aug 26, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 60/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for ooolabdev/ooosplat

When evaluating whether to contribute to ooolabdev/ooosplat, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of ooolabdev/ooosplat acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 8 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 0.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to ooolabdev/ooosplat

01

Is ooolabdev/ooosplat welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

ooolabdev/ooosplat has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Risky typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~8 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 13.4 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 13.4 places ooolabdev/ooosplat in the Risky tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for ooolabdev/ooosplat?

The external pull request merge rate is 0.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in ooolabdev/ooosplat?

ooolabdev/ooosplat does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for ooolabdev/ooosplat are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.