omnigent-ai/omnigent - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Omnigent is an open-source AI agent framework and meta-harness: orchestrate Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Pi, and custom agents — swap harnesses without rewriting, enforce policies and sandboxing, and collaborate in real time from any device.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 67/100

External PR Merge Rate: 67%

Response Time: 16h

First Timer Success: 43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is omnigent-ai/omnigent welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

omnigent-ai/omnigent has a recorded first-timer success rate of 42.7%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in omnigent-ai/omnigent respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 16.1 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 66.9 C-Rankâ„¢ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 66.9 places omnigent-ai/omnigent in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for omnigent-ai/omnigent?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for omnigent-ai/omnigent is 66.9%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in omnigent-ai/omnigent?

omnigent-ai/omnigent currently has 290 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

omnigent-ai
omnigent-ai/omnigentA•Welcoming9.5k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
omnigent-ai

omnigent-ai/omnigent

9,501
A•Welcoming(67/100)Python

Omnigent is an open-source AI agent framework and meta-harness: orchestrate Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Pi, and custom agents — swap harnesses without rewriting, enforce policies and sandboxing, and collaborate in real time from any device.

Compare•
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
8.7/10
Patience Score
8.8/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Highly welcoming maintainers in omnigent-ai/omnigent. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
16 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
66.9%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
42.7%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
96 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
66.9%
Merge Gauge
42.7%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe58/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for omnigent-ai/omnigent
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/omnigent-ai/omnigent)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/omnigent-ai/omnigent?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Problem or use case We run one shared, always-on omnigent-server with many long-lived, persistent hosts registered against it (one per developer workspace, provisioned by an internal platform — think one host per Coder/devcontainer workspace, each corresponding to a specific project/repo checkout). Each workspace exposes a dashboard tile that opens the shared omnigent web UI. Today that tile can only open the generic New Chat screen (/), where the user must manually find and pick their specific workspace's host from what can be a long, growing list of registered hosts. There's no way for the tile's URL to say "open New Chat pre-bound to this host" — the user has to correctly identify their own workspace among potentially dozens of others every time. We looked for an existing mechanism and found: No ?host=<id>//new/:hostId-style route on the New Chat screen (web/src/App.tsx, web/src/shell/NewChatDialog.tsx). The only related mechanism, ?project=<name> on /, only pre-selects a host

📅 Opened Aug 30, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 75/100Contribute

Version / pin omnigent CLI 0.10.0 (uv tool install --force "omnigent[tracing,claude-sdk]") Vendored tree pinned at tag v0.10.0, commit 40755dd8dddb07e1eb6e4055d1d9936e184ceb9b Host: macOS (darwin 25.5.0) Why a new issue This corrects and replaces #5103 (closed COMPLETED, no comments). #5103's impact claim was too strong and our later measurement disproved it: it said the claude-sdk lane "cannot export any telemetry at all regardless of how the daemon environment is configured." That is wrong — when the daemon itself is started in the foreground with the telemetry env set, the lane exports fine (claude_code.* events observed with model, token, cost and session identity). This issue states only the still-true, still-open remainder. Still-true claims OMNIGENT_RUNNER_ENV_PASSTHROUGH (omnigent/host/connect.py:581, consumed by _build_runner_env) did not deliver any named variable to a claude-sdk harness process in our probes — neither CLAUDE_CODE_ENABLE_TELEMETRY nor a completely gene

📅 Opened Aug 30, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 75/100Contribute

Version / pin omnigent CLI 0.10.0 (uv tool install --force "omnigent[tracing,claude-sdk]") Vendored tree pinned at tag v0.10.0, commit 40755dd8dddb07e1eb6e4055d1d9936e184ceb9b Host: macOS (darwin 25.5.0) Summary omnigent/runtime/telemetry.py ships both halves of W3C trace-context propagation: get_traceparent_env() (:670) to inject, and extract_trace_context() (:723) to extract. But no launch path extracts the dispatching client's incoming TRACEPARENT: the server generates its own conversation trace and propagates that downward. A wrapper that starts a span, sets TRACEPARENT in the environment, and invokes omnigent run ends up with a trace containing only its own spans; every span and event the run produces (runner, harness, harness-CLI telemetry) rides an omnigent-generated trace id. Measured exhibit (0.10.0, claude-sdk harness) One dispatch of ours: the dispatching wrapper's trace 5fed4abf… holds exactly its own 8 spans and nothing else. The same run's claude_code.* events carry o

📅 Opened Aug 30, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 75/100Contribute

Version / pin omnigent CLI 0.10.0 (uv tool install --force "omnigent[tracing,claude-sdk]") Vendored tree pinned at tag v0.10.0, commit 40755dd8dddb07e1eb6e4055d1d9936e184ceb9b Host: macOS (darwin 25.5.0) Summary os_env.sandbox.env_passthrough already solves the named half of environment delivery to spawned harnesses: a bundle spec can list env var names, the spec parser validates them (omnigent/inner/os_env.py:230-231), and the direct-mode executors (acp, codex, pi, kimi, goose, hermes, qwen) plus the sandbox spawn allowlist honour them, so the spawned CLI keeps whatever telemetry/config env the runner holds. This works well and we use it. What is missing is the valued half: values that vary per run. A dispatching client cannot set, e.g., OTEL_RESOURCE_ATTRIBUTES=myapp.run.id=<N> on the harness process of the specific run it is dispatching. env_passthrough resolves names from the runner's environment, which is per-daemon; per-run values cannot travel that way, especially when Harness

📅 Opened Aug 30, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 75/100Contribute

Problem Desktop users have different expectations for whether Enter sends a message or inserts a newline. The web composer currently provides no preference, while mobile must avoid accidental submission from Enter. Proposed behavior Add a device-local setting that switches desktop submission between Enter and Command/Ctrl+Enter. Apply the choice to existing-session and new-session composers. Keep mobile Enter reserved for inserting a newline. Show the active chords in composer tooltips and the keyboard shortcuts reference. Make General the default Settings section.

📅 Opened Aug 30, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 75/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for omnigent-ai/omnigent

When evaluating whether to contribute to omnigent-ai/omnigent, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of omnigent-ai/omnigent acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 16 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 66.9% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to omnigent-ai/omnigent

01

Is omnigent-ai/omnigent welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

omnigent-ai/omnigent has a recorded first-timer success rate of 42.7%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~16 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 66.9 C-Rankâ„¢ score represent?

The C-Rankâ„¢ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 66.9 places omnigent-ai/omnigent in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for omnigent-ai/omnigent?

The external pull request merge rate is 66.9%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in omnigent-ai/omnigent?

Yes, omnigent-ai/omnigent currently has 290 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rankâ„¢ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for omnigent-ai/omnigent are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.

omnigent-ai/omnigent • 66.9/100 C-Rank (A-Tier) | GetMerged