oculix-org/Oculix

Problem / motivation Would it be possible to have interaction with user but still check for something and if found possibly close that interaction before user (needs to) interact? Proposed solution Something like reply = Do.popAsk("Do this or that","Do something",15, exists=Pattern(img)) if reply == None: # popAsk Timeouted after 15s ( already works 👍 ) if reply == PaternExists: # popAsk Found pattern and continued without user interaction ( add this feature please 🙏 ) if reply: # popAsk Yes button pressed ( already works 👍 ) if not reply: # popAsk No button pressed ( already works 👍 ) Use case / impact If popups are based on some waiting for patterns, it can "autocontinue" if the pattern gets late. Additional context oculix-org/SikuliX1#456

Invitation: trusted contributor track for @adriancostin6 Hi @adriancostin6 — opening this publicly because CONTRIBUTING.md says trust escalations happen as a conversation, in the open, with both sides free to say no without weirdness. This isn't urgent, there's no deadline, and a "no thanks, happy as a casual contributor" reply is a perfectly good answer. Read this when you have 10 minutes, and reply when you've thought about it. 🙏 Why I'm asking You've shipped four solid contributions in the past few weeks, and they all share traits we need more of: #191 / #192 — App: whitespace-safe executable paths. You read the surrounding CommandLine code and proposed the right architectural shape, not just a quick \"\" wrap. #193 — GenericOsUtil + the WinUtil misleading-error-message fix. Two-for-one PR scope kept clean, and the error-message catch was the kind of thing only someone reading every log line carefully would spot. #206 — README Maven snippet groupId fix. Tiny PR, but