oceanbase/powercontext - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Not only memory but a full story.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 64/100

External PR Merge Rate: 30%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is oceanbase/powercontext welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

oceanbase/powercontext has a recorded first-timer success rate of 60.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in oceanbase/powercontext respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 64.1 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 64.1 places oceanbase/powercontext in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for oceanbase/powercontext?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for oceanbase/powercontext is 30.1%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in oceanbase/powercontext?

oceanbase/powercontext currently has 5 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

oceanbase
oceanbase/powercontextA•Welcoming1.3k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
oceanbase

oceanbase/powercontext

1,273
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(64/100)Python

Not only memory but a full story.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Growing Python project in oceanbase/powercontext welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with Python style conventions
  • •Keep PRs scoped and well-documented
  • •Include relevant test coverage for changes

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • •Do not break existing automated test suites
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors with feature work
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
30.1%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
60.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
48 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
30.1%
Merge Gauge
60.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe30/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for oceanbase/powercontext
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/oceanbase/powercontext)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/oceanbase/powercontext?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Feature description Add text search to the Dashboard Experience list using the existing family-scoped Artifact search API. Problem and proposed solution The Methods page supports Skill search, but users can only browse Experiences. Reuse the existing search form and Experience search semantics. Keep normal browsing when the query is empty. Acceptance: Queries return matching approved, active Experiences in the selected Scope. Clearing the query restores browsing. Query state is preserved during supported navigation. No matches and request failures have distinct messages. Labels and feedback work in English and Chinese. Add behavior coverage for search, clearing, and failure handling. Additional context The search backend was implemented in #1862; this task only adds Dashboard support. Entry points: src/powercontext/server/dashboard/content.py src/powercontext/server/dashboard/templates/methods.html Coordinate shared Dashboard changes with #1813. This issue will be open for claiming

📅 Opened Oct 10, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Feature description Show the existing extraction diagnostics in the human-readable output of powercontext capabilities. Problem and proposed solution The Server exposes extraction configuration, background execution state, and observations, but the CLI currently prints only Memory extraction: enabled/disabled. Display: Configuration status. Background location, role, state, and automatic-processing status. Observation status and window start. Last success and last failure code, stage, and time when available. Handle absent or unknown diagnostics explicitly. Historical observations must not be presented as a current health verdict. Preserve JSON output and use the existing response without additional probes. Add CLI coverage for available, missing, and unverified diagnostics. Additional context The backend diagnostics were implemented in #1796. Entry point: src/powercontext/client/cli.py, _print_human_response. This issue will be open for claiming on October 20, 2026. Please wait unti

📅 Opened Oct 10, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Describe the bug The Claude Code status line and Codex token-savings hook can display saved 0 when estimation is disabled or no comparable preparations exist. This makes missing measurements look like measured zero savings. Steps to reproduce Provide a valid scoped statistics response with recall.estimator: null and zero totals. Render it with either integration's formatter. Observe saved 0 instead of an unavailable-estimate state. Expected behavior Distinguish: Estimation disabled. No comparable data in the requested window. Measured zero savings. Positive savings or additional token cost. Valid responses without estimates should remain online. Preserve existing failure classification and accounting semantics. Actual behavior The formatter uses token_reduction without checking whether comparable measurements exist. Environment master ee0589d. Reproduced with controlled formatter inputs. Code: integrations/claude-code/plugins/powercontext/scripts/statusline.py integrations/codex/p

📅 Opened Oct 10, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Describe the bug The Codex and Claude Code hooks send the full user prompt as the recall query. Prompts longer than 8,192 characters exceed the PrepareContextRequest limit and cause automatic recall to fail. Steps to reproduce Pass an 8,193-character prompt to either hook's _prepare_context function, capturing the outgoing request. Validate the payload against PrepareContextRequest. Observe a query-length validation error. Expected behavior Use a deterministic bounded query for recall, following the existing ZCode implementation and documenting the truncation policy. Keep Source capture unchanged, including its existing size limit. Add regression coverage for short prompts, the length boundary, and Unicode input. Actual behavior The outgoing query contains the entire prompt and fails validation. Environment master ee0589d. Reproduced through request construction and schema validation, without a native host session. Code: integrations/{codex,claude-code}/plugins/powercontext/hooks/. R

📅 Opened Oct 10, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Feature description We have examples as integration with different agents(pi, claude, codex, etc...) I hope to have an example to show how to integrate with pip package like openAI/anthropic. Problem and proposed solution For people and agent to adopt with different agents, a guide or document to show how this repo work with native sdk. Alternatives considered No response Additional context No response Are you willing to contribute to this feature? Yes, I am willing to contribute code, docs, or design feedback.

📅 Opened Aug 26, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 75/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for oceanbase/powercontext

When evaluating whether to contribute to oceanbase/powercontext, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of oceanbase/powercontext acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 30.1% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to oceanbase/powercontext

01

Is oceanbase/powercontext welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

oceanbase/powercontext has a recorded first-timer success rate of 60.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 64.1 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 64.1 places oceanbase/powercontext in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for oceanbase/powercontext?

The external pull request merge rate is 30.1%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in oceanbase/powercontext?

Yes, oceanbase/powercontext currently has 5 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for oceanbase/powercontext are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.