nvim-neotest/neotest - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

An extensible framework for interacting with tests within NeoVim.

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 52/100

External PR Merge Rate: 90%

Response Time: 21d

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is nvim-neotest/neotest welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

nvim-neotest/neotest has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in nvim-neotest/neotest respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 492.8 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 51.8 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 51.8 places nvim-neotest/neotest in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for nvim-neotest/neotest?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for nvim-neotest/neotest is 90.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in nvim-neotest/neotest?

nvim-neotest/neotest does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

nvim-neotest
nvim-neotest/neotestBSolid3.1k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
nvim-neotest

nvim-neotest/neotest

3,113
BSolid(52/100)Lua

An extensible framework for interacting with tests within NeoVim.

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Active Lua repository in nvim-neotest/neotest with ongoing community development and issue triage.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with Lua style conventions
  • Keep PRs scoped and well-documented

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • Do not break existing automated test suites
Response Velocity
20 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
90.0%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
6 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
90.0%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe66/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for nvim-neotest/neotest
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/nvim-neotest/neotest)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/nvim-neotest/neotest?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (0)

View on GitHub

No cached good first issues currently tracked for nvim-neotest/neotest.

View all good first issues directly on GitHub

Looking for more Lua beginner tasks?Explore Lua GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for nvim-neotest/neotest

When evaluating whether to contribute to nvim-neotest/neotest, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of nvim-neotest/neotest acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 20 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 90.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to nvim-neotest/neotest

01

Is nvim-neotest/neotest welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

nvim-neotest/neotest has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~20 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 51.8 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 51.8 places nvim-neotest/neotest in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for nvim-neotest/neotest?

The external pull request merge rate is 90.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in nvim-neotest/neotest?

nvim-neotest/neotest does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for nvim-neotest/neotest are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.