nim-lang/packages - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

List of packages for Nimble

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 60/100

External PR Merge Rate: 81%

Response Time: 2d

First Timer Success: 73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is nim-lang/packages welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

nim-lang/packages has a recorded first-timer success rate of 72.7%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in nim-lang/packages respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 48.3 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 60.2 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 60.2 places nim-lang/packages in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for nim-lang/packages?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for nim-lang/packages is 80.7%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in nim-lang/packages?

nim-lang/packages does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

nim-lang
nim-lang/packagesAWelcoming500
GitHub
Back to Explorer
nim-lang

nim-lang/packages

500
AWelcoming(60/100)NINim

List of packages for Nimble

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Architecture Gatekeeper

Warmth Score
7.2/10
Patience Score
8.0/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Strict review standards in nim-lang/packages. Ensure PR scope matches issue requirements closely before requesting review.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in nim-lang/packages focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • 1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • 2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • 3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Run the repository formatter and linter locally
  • Add or update tests for changed behavior before requesting review
  • Keep PRs small and focused on one change

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit formatting-only noise with feature changes
  • Do not leave requested test coverage unresolved
  • Do not mix unrelated refactors with feature work
Response Velocity
2 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
80.7%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
72.7%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
3 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
80.7%
Merge Gauge
72.7%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe54/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for nim-lang/packages
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/nim-lang/packages)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/nim-lang/packages?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (0)

View on GitHub

No cached good first issues currently tracked for nim-lang/packages.

View all good first issues directly on GitHub

Looking for more Nim beginner tasks?Explore Nim GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for nim-lang/packages

When evaluating whether to contribute to nim-lang/packages, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of nim-lang/packages acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 2 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 80.7% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to nim-lang/packages

01

Is nim-lang/packages welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

nim-lang/packages has a recorded first-timer success rate of 72.7%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~2 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 60.2 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 60.2 places nim-lang/packages in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for nim-lang/packages?

The external pull request merge rate is 80.7%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in nim-lang/packages?

nim-lang/packages does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for nim-lang/packages are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.