nexu-io/open-design - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

🎨 Best DeepSeek Harness Design Plugin. The open-source Claude Design alternative. 🖥️ Local-first desktop app. 🖼️ Your coding agent becomes the design engine: prototypes, landing pages, dashboards, slides, images & video — real files, HTML/PDF/PPTX/MP4 export. 🤖 Claude Code / Codex / Cursor / DeepSeek Harness / OpenCode & 20+ CLIs via BYOK.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 69/100

External PR Merge Rate: 62%

Response Time: 3h

First Timer Success: 51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is nexu-io/open-design welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

nexu-io/open-design has a recorded first-timer success rate of 51.4%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in nexu-io/open-design respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 3.3 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 68.6 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 68.6 places nexu-io/open-design in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for nexu-io/open-design?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for nexu-io/open-design is 62.4%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in nexu-io/open-design?

nexu-io/open-design currently has 210 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

nexu-io
nexu-io/open-designA•Welcoming100.4k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
nexu-io

nexu-io/open-design

100,395
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(69/100)TypeScript

🎨 Best DeepSeek Harness Design Plugin. The open-source Claude Design alternative. 🖥️ Local-first desktop app. 🖼️ Your coding agent becomes the design engine: prototypes, landing pages, dashboards, slides, images & video — real files, HTML/PDF/PPTX/MP4 export. 🤖 Claude Code / Codex / Cursor / DeepSeek Harness / OpenCode & 20+ CLIs via BYOK.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
8.7/10
Patience Score
8.6/10
Nitpick Rate
40%

Highly welcoming maintainers in nexu-io/open-design. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
3 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
62.4%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
51.4%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
192 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
62.4%
Merge Gauge
51.4%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe68/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for nexu-io/open-design
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/nexu-io/open-design)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/nexu-io/open-design?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

What problem are you trying to solve? On Home, the compact model switcher (the top-bar chip) opens a popover that lists the current CLI agent's models as a short scrollable radio list (six rows visible). With providers that use provider/model ids and many same-family variants, every row ellipsises to the same shared prefix — with opencode-go, rows all read opencode-go/deepseek-… / opencode-go/glm-… — so you can't tell rows apart, or see which model is active, without hovering one by one. The chip itself truncates the same way, so the selected model is unreadable at a glance. On this machine the OpenCode agent exposes 77 models, which makes the missing filter worse. Reproduction (Open Design 0.24.1, macOS Apple Silicon; also reproduced on a current main dev run): Use a CLI/provider whose catalog has many same-family ids (e.g. opencode-go with several opencode-go/deepseek-* models). Click the model chip in the Home top bar. The popover shows Default (CLI config) + rows that all

📅 Opened Oct 9, 2026💬 8 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Issue 2 — A run that produced an artifact is reported as failed, and the failure card hides the artifact Related to Issue 1, but a UX/contract problem on its own: state.json for the run: artifactCount: 1, artifactPaths: ["image-…png"], failureCategory: "empty_output". The conversation shows only a red "未能生成内容 — AI 未能生成内容,请重新发起任务,或更换模型后再试。" card, with buttons 联系我们 / 导出日志 / 切换到 OpenDesign Cloud. Nothing in the UI mentions that a usable artifact was produced and is sitting in the project. Requested fix If artifactCount > 0, show the artifact result card alongside the failure state (or downgrade to a warning), and state which artifacts were produced. Consider not classifying "artifact produced, no prose" as a run failure.

📅 Opened Oct 7, 2026💬 6 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Environment OpenDesign docker image ghcr.io/nexu-io/od:0.24.1, self-hosted (daemon + web in Docker via Dokploy) Media provider: custom-image → Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Bailian) OpenAI-compatible endpoint (https://<workspace>.cn-beijing.maas.aliyuncs.com/compatible-mode/v1), model qwen-image-3.0-pro Dispatched by the agent via od media generate --surface image --model custom-image --image <project-relative ref> ... Steps to reproduce Settings → Media providers → Custom Image API: Aliyun Model Studio compatible-mode base URL, API key, model qwen-image-3.0-pro. Text-to-image works fine: od media generate --surface image --model custom-image --aspect 16:9 --prompt "…" → 200, file written. ✅ Pass a reference image: … --image ref.jpeg --aspect 16:9 --prompt "…" → task fails immediately. Actual result task failed: custom image 404: {"taskId":"…","status":"failed","error":{"message":"custom image 404: ","status":400,"nextStep":"switch-model"}} Note the empty messag

📅 Opened Oct 4, 2026💬 9 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Summary On Windows, when an ACP-based agent runtime resolves to an npm-installed CLI shim (kimi.CMD), detectAcpModels crashes with spawn EINVAL, so /api/agents reports modelsSource: "fallback" and the UI model picker shows only the runtime def's hard-coded fallback IDs — none of which exist in the current CLI, leaving users with only "Default (CLI config)". Environment OpenDesign 0.24.1 (Windows x64 desktop app, release-stable-win) Agent: kimi runtime, Kimi Code 2.0.2 installed via npm global (C:\Users\<user>\AppData\Roaming\npm\kimi.CMD) Node 24.16.0 (also reproduces on Node ≥ 20.12) Reproduction On Windows, install Kimi Code via npm i -g (so kimi resolves to a .cmd shim). Open the app, go to agent/model selection for the kimi runtime. GET /api/agents shows: { "id": "kimi", "available": true, "version": "2.0.2", "modelsSource": "fallback", "models": ["default", "kimi-k2-turbo-preview", "moonshot-v1-8k", "moonshot-v1-32k"] } These fallback IDs are from the legacy kimi-cli era;

📅 Opened Oct 4, 2026💬 6 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

What happens An agent connection test for the Reasonix CLI runs reasonix acp inside a throwaway od-conn-test-* temp dir (apps/daemon/src/connectionTest.ts), with cwd pointed at the temp dir. The probe sends a real smoke prompt, so the Reasonix CLI starts an actual session — and persists it into the user's real state home (%APPDATA%\reasonix\sessions\*.jsonl), because the test isolates cwd but not the child's state root. Reasonix's session import then picks that file up; since the probe's cwd belongs to no project, the conversation gets bound to the default workspace. Net effect: every "Test connection" click deposits a ghost conversation into the user's Reasonix app — one the user never created and can't attribute to OpenDesign. Proposed fix One line in connectionTest.ts: set REASONIX_STATE_HOME=<tempDir> in the env handed to the reasonix probe. Per Reasonix's documented path model (its docs/CONFIG_PATHS.md), REASONIX_STATE_HOME relocates state (sessions/archive/memory) only; con

📅 Opened Oct 3, 2026💬 7 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute
Looking for more TypeScript beginner tasks?Explore TypeScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for nexu-io/open-design

When evaluating whether to contribute to nexu-io/open-design, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of nexu-io/open-design acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 3 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 62.4% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to nexu-io/open-design

01

Is nexu-io/open-design welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

nexu-io/open-design has a recorded first-timer success rate of 51.4%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~3 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 68.6 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 68.6 places nexu-io/open-design in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for nexu-io/open-design?

The external pull request merge rate is 62.4%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in nexu-io/open-design?

Yes, nexu-io/open-design currently has 210 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for nexu-io/open-design are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.