nexu-io/open-design - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

🎨 Best DeepSeek Harness Design Plugin. The open-source Claude Design alternative. 🖥️ Local-first desktop app. 🖼️ Your coding agent becomes the design engine: prototypes, landing pages, dashboards, slides, images & video — real files, HTML/PDF/PPTX/MP4 export. 🤖 Claude Code / Codex / Cursor / DeepSeek Harness / OpenCode & 20+ CLIs via BYOK.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 66/100

External PR Merge Rate: 64%

Response Time: 4h

First Timer Success: 51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is nexu-io/open-design welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

nexu-io/open-design has a recorded first-timer success rate of 51.4%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in nexu-io/open-design respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 3.5 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 66.1 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 66.1 places nexu-io/open-design in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for nexu-io/open-design?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for nexu-io/open-design is 63.6%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in nexu-io/open-design?

nexu-io/open-design currently has 183 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

nexu-io
nexu-io/open-designAWelcoming92.7k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
nexu-io

nexu-io/open-design

92,706
AWelcoming(66/100)TypeScript

🎨 Best DeepSeek Harness Design Plugin. The open-source Claude Design alternative. 🖥️ Local-first desktop app. 🖼️ Your coding agent becomes the design engine: prototypes, landing pages, dashboards, slides, images & video — real files, HTML/PDF/PPTX/MP4 export. 🤖 Claude Code / Codex / Cursor / DeepSeek Harness / OpenCode & 20+ CLIs via BYOK.

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
8.7/10
Patience Score
8.6/10
Nitpick Rate
40%

Highly welcoming maintainers in nexu-io/open-design. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
3 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
63.6%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
51.4%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
183 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
63.6%
Merge Gauge
51.4%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe68/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for nexu-io/open-design
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/nexu-io/open-design)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/nexu-io/open-design?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Summary On 0.21.0 the MCP server picks its workspace identity by taking the first entry from /api/workspace/directory instead of the activeWorkspaceId that the very same response returns. When a user belongs to more than one workspace and the active one is not first in the list, every MCP read of that user's own local projects fails with: 403 WORKSPACE_PROJECT_PERMISSION_DENIED {"error":{"code":"WORKSPACE_PROJECT_PERMISSION_DENIED","message":"workspace project read is not allowed"}} get_active_context still works (it uses a different endpoint), so the agent can see the project's name and id but cannot read anything inside it — which makes the failure look like a permissions setting the user is supposed to flip somewhere. There is no such setting. Environment Open Design 0.21.0 (launcher-managed install, macOS 15) MCP client: Claude Code, stdio (daemon-cli.mjs mcp --daemon-url …) Account profile prod, session authenticated User is owner of two workspaces, both reported as workspac

📅 Opened Aug 30, 2026💬 6 comments
Quality: 85/100Contribute

Summary Every od automation create and od automation update invocation fails with a temporal dead zone ReferenceError on 0.21.1. The headless automation surface the CLI help advertises for external agents is unusable as a result. ReferenceError: Cannot access 'splitAutomationIds' before initialization at automationContextFromFlags (.../apps/daemon/dist/cli.js:11346:22) at Object.runAutomation (.../apps/daemon/dist/cli.js:11905:29) at async .../apps/daemon/dist/cli.js:851:5 Reproduce Source install, daemon running: export OD_DAEMON_URL=http://127.0.0.1:<daemon-port> node apps/daemon/bin/od.mjs automation create \ --name "example" --prompt "example" --schedule "daily:03:00" automation update <id> --name ... fails identically. automation list, get and run are unaffected, because they do not go through automationContextFromFlags. Cause Not environment specific and not a race. In the bundled apps/daemon/dist/cli.js: 851: await SUBCOMMAND_MAP[first](rest);

📅 Opened Aug 30, 2026💬 5 comments
Quality: 75/100Contribute

First: the pi runtime adapter works beautifully end-to-end — we verified a full run today (spawn via pi --mode rpc, model passthrough deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash, 4 tool_use/tool_result pairs mapped, clean exit 0, 17s total, 99% prompt-cache hit, session-file discovery for native resume engaged). The --list-models TSV parse surfaced 23 models. Great adapter. Two observability suggestions from dogfooding: 1. Record agent_cli_version in execution diagnostics executionDiagnostics.environment.agentCliVersion came back not_collected / agent_cli_version_not_recorded, even though the daemon clearly probes pi --version during runtime detection (the agent list shows the resolved version). Recording the resolved CLI version per run would make version-specific regressions debuggable — e.g. we just hit a pi-ai 0.84.3 packaging defect (#7608) that doesn't exist in 0.80.x, and correlating "which agent CLI version executed this run" would have halved the triage time. The detection probe result cou

📅 Opened Aug 30, 2026💬 7 comments
Quality: 75/100Contribute

What happened? When a generated deck uses a real, self-navigating presentation library (reveal.js is the concrete case we hit) instead of OpenDesign's own .slide.active convention, the deck thumbnail rail shows the same slide (always the first one) for every single slide, even though the main preview pane navigates correctly and each slide's own markup is genuinely different. Observed directly in the product with a real 9-slide deck (screenshot on file, but it contains confidential business content so it isn't attached here - the minimal repro below reproduces the same underlying DOM signature with placeholder content instead). Steps to reproduce Save the attached index.html (bottom of this issue) as an OpenDesign project's deck file, or just open it directly in a browser first to inspect the underlying DOM state described in "Evidence" below (no OpenDesign build needed for that part). Open it as a deck in OpenDesign. Look at the thumbnail rail on the left. All 3 thumbnails render "Sl

📅 Opened Aug 30, 2026💬 5 comments
Quality: 60/100Contribute

Summary PR #7267 fixed a defect in apps/desktop/src/main/updater/store.ts where isOsManagedRootArtifact() matched .DS_Store/Thumbs.db/desktop.ini/.localized by name only, with no lstat check confirming the entry is actually a plain file. That let a directory or symlink squatting on one of those names be silently treated as harmless OS litter — bypassing the empty-root claim check and staying permanently excluded from unexpected-entry corruption validation. packages/download/src/store.ts's ensureManagedBase() has the identical unpatched pattern. It was already flagged once as a follow-up (#7266 → merged via #7268), but that merge duplicated the same name-only check rather than the type-verified version: // packages/download/src/store.ts:27-34 (current upstream/main) const OS_MANAGED_ROOT_ARTIFACTS = new Set([".DS_Store", "Thumbs.db", "desktop.ini", ".localized"]); function isOsManagedRootArtifact(name: string): boolean { return OS_MANAGED_ROOT_ARTIFACTS.has(name); } // line 107, i

📅 Opened Aug 30, 2026💬 10 comments
Quality: 75/100Contribute
Looking for more TypeScript beginner tasks?Explore TypeScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for nexu-io/open-design

When evaluating whether to contribute to nexu-io/open-design, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of nexu-io/open-design acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 3 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 63.6% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to nexu-io/open-design

01

Is nexu-io/open-design welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

nexu-io/open-design has a recorded first-timer success rate of 51.4%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~3 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 66.1 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 66.1 places nexu-io/open-design in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for nexu-io/open-design?

The external pull request merge rate is 63.6%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in nexu-io/open-design?

Yes, nexu-io/open-design currently has 183 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for nexu-io/open-design are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.