nasa-gibs/worldview - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Interactive interface for browsing global, full-resolution satellite imagery

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 65/100

External PR Merge Rate: 84%

Response Time: 3d

First Timer Success: 80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is nasa-gibs/worldview welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

nasa-gibs/worldview has a recorded first-timer success rate of 80.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in nasa-gibs/worldview respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 70.5 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 65.5 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 65.5 places nasa-gibs/worldview in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for nasa-gibs/worldview?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for nasa-gibs/worldview is 84.1%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in nasa-gibs/worldview?

nasa-gibs/worldview does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

nasa-gibs
nasa-gibs/worldviewAWelcoming1.3k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
nasa-gibs

nasa-gibs/worldview

1,267
AWelcoming(65/100)JavaScript

Interactive interface for browsing global, full-resolution satellite imagery

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Active maintainer team in nasa-gibs/worldview welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with repository style conventions
  • Keep PRs focused and well-documented

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • Do not break existing automated test suites
Response Velocity
2 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
84.1%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
80.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
4 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
84.1%
Merge Gauge
80.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe58/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for nasa-gibs/worldview
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/nasa-gibs/worldview)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/nasa-gibs/worldview?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (0)

View on GitHub

No cached good first issues currently tracked for nasa-gibs/worldview.

View all good first issues directly on GitHub

Looking for more JavaScript beginner tasks?Explore JavaScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for nasa-gibs/worldview

When evaluating whether to contribute to nasa-gibs/worldview, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of nasa-gibs/worldview acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 2 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 84.1% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to nasa-gibs/worldview

01

Is nasa-gibs/worldview welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

nasa-gibs/worldview has a recorded first-timer success rate of 80.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~2 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 65.5 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 65.5 places nasa-gibs/worldview in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for nasa-gibs/worldview?

The external pull request merge rate is 84.1%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in nasa-gibs/worldview?

nasa-gibs/worldview does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for nasa-gibs/worldview are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.