musescore/MuseScore - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

MuseScore is an open source and free music notation software. For support, contribution, bug reports, visit MuseScore.org. Fork and make pull requests!

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 66/100

External PR Merge Rate: 80%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is musescore/MuseScore welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

musescore/MuseScore has a recorded first-timer success rate of 55.3%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in musescore/MuseScore respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 66.4 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 66.4 places musescore/MuseScore in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for musescore/MuseScore?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for musescore/MuseScore is 79.5%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in musescore/MuseScore?

musescore/MuseScore currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

musescore
musescore/MuseScoreA•Welcoming15.2k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
musescore

musescore/MuseScore

15,214
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(66/100)C++

MuseScore is an open source and free music notation software. For support, contribution, bug reports, visit MuseScore.org. Fork and make pull requests!

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
9.2/10
Patience Score
9.0/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Highly welcoming maintainers in musescore/MuseScore. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
79.5%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
55.3%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
118 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
79.5%
Merge Gauge
55.3%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe48/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for musescore/MuseScore
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/musescore/MuseScore)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/musescore/MuseScore?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

Issue type UX/Interaction bug (incorrect behaviour) Description with steps to reproduce Dragging a stave spacer on top of another of a different type replaces the original spacer correctly, but Undo removes any spacers rather than reinstating the original. Supporting files, videos and screenshots Screen.Recording.2026-07-31.at.12.31.25.mov In which versions of MuseScore Studio is this issue present? Latest main Regression No. Operating system macOS 26.5.2 Additional context No response Checklist This report follows the guidelines for reporting bugs and issues I have verified that this issue has not been logged before, by searching the issue tracker for similar issues I have attached all requested files and information to this report I have attempted to identify the root problem as concisely as possible, and have used minimal reproducible examples where possible

📅 Opened Jul 31, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute

Issue type UI bug (incorrect info or interface appearance) Description with steps to reproduce Upon opening the app & selecting a score (previously having set the app to dark mode, as well as having the invert score option ticked), the whole app gets much brighter than expected—a pale purplish/reddish hue. This makes everything harder to read (including the settings) & could be considered to look bad. This issue also affects light mode, although I don't use it enough to know anything specific. The only workaround is to open a new instance of MuseScore & closing that score. This somehow reverts the 1st instance to normal. Repeat for subsequent open windows. Normal hex values for Main UI: #2D2D30 Score Background: #000000 Observed hex values for Main UI: #807F89 Score Background: #1D191A Text color is normal #FFFFFF, Home/Publish pages are normal, & Preferences & other windows are also normal (I have not checked everything, though). Supporting files, videos and screenshots In which ve

📅 Opened Jan 23, 2026💬 5 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute
Looking for more C++ beginner tasks?Explore C++ GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for musescore/MuseScore

When evaluating whether to contribute to musescore/MuseScore, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of musescore/MuseScore acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 79.5% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to musescore/MuseScore

01

Is musescore/MuseScore welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

musescore/MuseScore has a recorded first-timer success rate of 55.3%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 66.4 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 66.4 places musescore/MuseScore in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for musescore/MuseScore?

The external pull request merge rate is 79.5%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in musescore/MuseScore?

Yes, musescore/MuseScore currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for musescore/MuseScore are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.