modem-dev/hunk - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Review-first terminal diff viewer for agentic coders

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 69/100

External PR Merge Rate: 80%

Response Time: 15h

First Timer Success: 50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is modem-dev/hunk welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

modem-dev/hunk has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in modem-dev/hunk respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 14.5 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 69.2 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 69.2 places modem-dev/hunk in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for modem-dev/hunk?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for modem-dev/hunk is 80.5%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in modem-dev/hunk?

modem-dev/hunk currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

modem-dev
modem-dev/hunkAWelcoming8.9k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
modem-dev

modem-dev/hunk

8,922
AWelcoming(69/100)TypeScript

Review-first terminal diff viewer for agentic coders

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
8.7/10
Patience Score
8.8/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Highly welcoming maintainers in modem-dev/hunk. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
14 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
80.5%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
50.0%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
49 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
80.5%
Merge Gauge
50.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe66/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for modem-dev/hunk
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/modem-dev/hunk)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/modem-dev/hunk?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Summary Hunk currently calls its single-column diff presentation the stack or stacked layout. That terminology is incorrect: the implemented presentation is a unified diff. Rename this layout to unified throughout the product, public APIs, implementation, tests, documentation, examples, and maintained media. This is a terminology change only. Rendering, navigation, responsive behavior, wrapping, copying, notes, and scrolling should behave exactly as they do today. Look at the implementation plan before starting. It contains the investigated file map, compatibility policy, rename guidance, test coverage, media audit, and validation checklist. Desired vocabulary Current Replacement Stack layout Unified layout Stacked view Unified view Canonical stack value Canonical unified value Internal Stack* / stack* names Unified* / unified* Apply these replacements only where “stack” describes the diff layout. Do not rename unrelated uses such as call stacks, stack traces, parse

📅 Opened Aug 30, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Problem The shared key-chord parser removes empty segments after splitting a chord on +. As a result, malformed bindings are silently interpreted as different valid shortcuts: s+ → s +s → s ctrl++s → ctrl+s ctrl+s+ → ctrl+s For example, parseKeyChord("s+") currently returns the same parsed chord as parseKeyChord("s"), and the malformed chord matches a real s key event. The behavior comes from filtering empty tokens before the parser validates the modifier and base-key structure in src/extension-api/keys.ts. Why this matters This grammar is shared by user [keybindings], extension registerCommand bindings, Hunk's own command table, and the public matchesKey helper. A typo can therefore claim and execute a real shortcut instead of being rejected and surfaced as an unusable chord. This is also inconsistent with the parser's existing behavior for other malformed chords such as ctlr+s, f13, and ctrl+, which are rejected rather than normalized. Expected behavior Key cho

📅 Opened Aug 30, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Problem synthesizeKeyEvent returns a plain object asserted as OpenTUI's KeyEvent. The synthetic object contains the chord fields used by current matching, but omits required event fields such as eventType and source. Its preventDefault and stopPropagation methods also do not update the state exposed by real KeyEvent getters. The current round-trip test only verifies chord matching. Synthetic events are also passed to command matchers and programmatically invoked handlers, which may legitimately inspect the rest of the KeyEvent contract. Proposed direction Construct the exported OpenTUI KeyEvent class with a complete parsed-key payload instead of asserting a partial object. Use explicit synthetic defaults such as eventType: "press" and source: "raw" unless a more appropriate source is available. Acceptance criteria synthesizeKeyEvent returns a real KeyEvent instance without a double assertion. Existing chord matching behavior remains unchanged. eventType and source are populated. preve

📅 Opened Aug 16, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Problem The deprecated registerSidebarView contract declares files as a mutable ExtensionDiffFile[], while the pane contract uses a readonly list and the host supplies frozen file views. Registration currently bridges the component types with a double assertion. A legacy sidebar following its declared contract and calling files.sort(), files.push(), or another mutating method can therefore throw during rendering. Proposed direction Replace the component assertion with an explicit legacy adapter that maps ExtensionPaneProps to ExtensionSidebarViewProps. If the deprecated mutable contract must remain compatible, pass a shallow mutable copy of the files array. The adapter should also make the intentionally omitted new pane fields explicit rather than relying on function variance. Acceptance criteria A legacy sidebar can mutate its received files array without mutating host-owned state or throwing because the array is frozen. Modern pane components continue receiving the readonly host pro

📅 Opened Aug 16, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Problem reviewEventId can produce IDs that parseReviewEventId rejects for valid ReviewPublicationAddress values. The parser currently limits the revision component to 15 digits: /^revent:([a-z-]+):(.+)@(\d{1,15})$/ Elsewhere, state revisions are accepted as non-negative safe integers. Safe integers can contain 16 digits; for example, Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER is 9007199254740991. As a result, an event ID built from a valid high revision does not round-trip through the shared parser. Why this matters The event ID builder and parser form one protocol grammar used by SSE producers and consumers. A value emitted by the builder should not be rejected by the parser when its source address satisfies the shared publication contract. Proposed direction Allow up to 16 digits in the event-ID grammar and retain Number.isSafeInteger as the authoritative numeric bound, matching the generation parser's approach. Acceptance criteria IDs built with Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER parse successfully. Values abov

📅 Opened Aug 16, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more TypeScript beginner tasks?Explore TypeScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for modem-dev/hunk

When evaluating whether to contribute to modem-dev/hunk, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of modem-dev/hunk acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 14 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 80.5% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to modem-dev/hunk

01

Is modem-dev/hunk welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

modem-dev/hunk has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~14 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 69.2 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 69.2 places modem-dev/hunk in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for modem-dev/hunk?

The external pull request merge rate is 80.5%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in modem-dev/hunk?

Yes, modem-dev/hunk currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for modem-dev/hunk are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.