mkbhardwas12/pwned-deps - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Is your lockfile pwned? 5-second scan of npm/PyPI/Maven/Cargo/Go/RubyGems lockfiles for compromised packages — OSV + curated campaign feed, --min-age cooling-off gate, exit 4 when a scan is incomplete. SLSA L3, Sigstore-signed feed.

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 55/100

External PR Merge Rate: 71%

Response Time: 5h

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is mkbhardwas12/pwned-deps welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

mkbhardwas12/pwned-deps has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in mkbhardwas12/pwned-deps respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 5.2 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 54.7 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 54.7 places mkbhardwas12/pwned-deps in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for mkbhardwas12/pwned-deps?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for mkbhardwas12/pwned-deps is 71.4%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in mkbhardwas12/pwned-deps?

mkbhardwas12/pwned-deps currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

mkbhardwas12
mkbhardwas12/pwned-depsB•Solid164
GitHub
Back to Explorer
mkbhardwas12

mkbhardwas12/pwned-deps

164
Active (30d)B•Solid(55/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)Capped at B (Bus Factor: 1)Python

Is your lockfile pwned? 5-second scan of npm/PyPI/Maven/Cargo/Go/RubyGems lockfiles for compromised packages — OSV + curated campaign feed, --min-age cooling-off gate, exit 4 when a scan is incomplete. SLSA L3, Sigstore-signed feed.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.5/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Collaborative maintainer environment in mkbhardwas12/pwned-deps. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in mkbhardwas12/pwned-deps focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
5 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
71.4%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
1 core
Single maintainer review bottleneck
Diagnostic Health HUD
71.4%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe55/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for mkbhardwas12/pwned-deps
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/mkbhardwas12/pwned-deps)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/mkbhardwas12/pwned-deps?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (4)

View on GitHub

Publish ghcr.io/mkbhardwas12/pwned-deps:<version> from release.yml (distroless Python, non-root, SBOM + provenance attested with docker/build-push-action + actions/attest-build-provenance), and add a copy-paste GitLab CI template under examples/gitlab/ that uses it. Done when the image is built and pushed by the release workflow (SHA-pinned actions, same version gate), docker run --rm -v "$PWD":/src ghcr.io/mkbhardwas12/pwned-deps check /src works, and the README CI section links the template.

📅 Opened Sep 20, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Several bundled campaigns are account hijacks but are described only by exact bad versions. Adding a compromised_maintainers block (name + compromised_after / compromised_until) lets 0.2.0's timestamp resolution confirm any version published in the window — including ones a source blog missed. Candidates (all in src/pwned_deps/extras_data/extras.json): EXTRA-2021-0001 ua-parser-js (npm) — hijack window per the maintainer's GitHub issue EXTRA-2021-0002 coa, EXTRA-2021-0003 rc (npm) — same operator, ~4h windows EXTRA-2022-0001 ctx (PyPI) — expired-domain takeover; window from the PyPI upload times EXTRA-2023-0001 @ledgerhq/connect-kit — ex-employee phishing, ~5h window Rules: cite the source for both timestamps, keep the window conservative (see CONTRIBUTING.md — a too-wide window produces false CONFIRMEDs), and add a test asserting the in-window fixture version is CONFIRMED and an out-of-window one is cleared (mock the registry like tests/advisory/test_registry_and_min

📅 Opened Sep 20, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

0.2.0 shipped --min-age and maintainer-window confirmation for npm + PyPI only (src/pwned_deps/advisory/registry.py). Other ecosystems are silently skipped by the policy. Sources: crates.io — https://crates.io/api/v1/crates/<name>/versions → versions[].created_at (needs a descriptive User-Agent; already set) RubyGems — https://rubygems.org/api/v1/versions/<name>.json → created_at Go — https://proxy.golang.org/<module>/@v/<version>.info → Time (module path must be case-escaped: !m for uppercase) Maven — Maven Central search https://search.maven.org/solrsearch/select?q=g:<g>+AND+a:<a>+AND+v:<v> → timestamp (ms) Done when each has a _<eco>_publish_time() in RegistryClient, SUPPORTED is extended, the CLI help text and README network-footprint list are updated, and tests mock each endpoint (see tests/advisory/test_registry_and_min_age.py).

📅 Opened Sep 20, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Add packages.lock.json (NuGet, dotnet restore --use-lock-file) support. Shape: JSON; dependencies → target framework → package name → { "type": "Direct|Transitive", "resolved": "1.2.3" }. OSV ecosystem string is NuGet. Package IDs are case-insensitive — normalise to the registry casing or lowercase consistently. Done when src/pwned_deps/parsers/nuget.py, Ecosystem.NUGET = "NuGet", detector entry Fixture + tests (dedupe the same package across multiple target frameworks) README row

📅 Opened Sep 20, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for mkbhardwas12/pwned-deps

When evaluating whether to contribute to mkbhardwas12/pwned-deps, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of mkbhardwas12/pwned-deps acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 5 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 71.4% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to mkbhardwas12/pwned-deps

01

Is mkbhardwas12/pwned-deps welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

mkbhardwas12/pwned-deps has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~5 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 54.7 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 54.7 places mkbhardwas12/pwned-deps in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for mkbhardwas12/pwned-deps?

The external pull request merge rate is 71.4%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in mkbhardwas12/pwned-deps?

Yes, mkbhardwas12/pwned-deps currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for mkbhardwas12/pwned-deps are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.