microsoft/OpenAPI.NET - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

The OpenAPI.NET SDK contains a useful object model for OpenAPI documents in .NET along with common serializers to extract raw OpenAPI JSON and YAML documents from the model.

C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 71/100

External PR Merge Rate: 88%

Response Time: 1d

First Timer Success: 83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is microsoft/OpenAPI.NET welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

microsoft/OpenAPI.NET has a recorded first-timer success rate of 83.3%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in microsoft/OpenAPI.NET respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 27.4 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 71.5 C-Rank™ score (S Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 71.5 places microsoft/OpenAPI.NET in the S tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for microsoft/OpenAPI.NET?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for microsoft/OpenAPI.NET is 88.3%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in microsoft/OpenAPI.NET?

microsoft/OpenAPI.NET currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

microsoft
microsoft/OpenAPI.NETSElite1.6k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
microsoft

microsoft/OpenAPI.NET

1,607
SElite(71/100)C#

The OpenAPI.NET SDK contains a useful object model for OpenAPI documents in .NET along with common serializers to extract raw OpenAPI JSON and YAML documents from the model.

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.6/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Collaborative maintainer environment in microsoft/OpenAPI.NET. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
1 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
88.3%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
83.3%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
11 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
88.3%
Merge Gauge
83.3%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe70/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for microsoft/OpenAPI.NET
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/microsoft/OpenAPI.NET)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/microsoft/OpenAPI.NET?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (4)

View on GitHub

I want to be able to compare two different OpenApiSchema instances for equality. I think it would make sense to implement equality on all object model types so that they implement IEquatable<T> and override object.Equals and GetHashCode methods.

📅 Opened Jul 23, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 75/100Contribute

Describe the bug After updating from v3.7.0 to v3.9.0, the nullable property disappears when writing an OpenAPI 3.0 document. Repro steps using Microsoft.OpenApi; var metaSchema = new OpenApiSchema { Type = JsonSchemaType.Object, AdditionalProperties = new OpenApiSchema { Type = JsonSchemaType.Null } }; var baseSchema = new OpenApiSchema { Type = JsonSchemaType.Object, Id = "base", Properties = new Dictionary<string, IOpenApiSchema> { ["id"] = new OpenApiSchema { Type = JsonSchemaType.String } } }; var derivedSchema = new OpenApiSchema { Type = JsonSchemaType.Null, AllOf = new List<IOpenApiSchema> { new OpenApiSchemaReference(baseSchema.Id) }, Properties = new Dictionary<string, IOpenApiSchema> { ["kind"] = new OpenApiSchema { Type = JsonSchemaType.String } } }; var doc = new OpenApiDocument(); doc.Components ??= new OpenApiComponen

📅 Opened Jul 18, 2026💬 18 comments
Quality: 65/100Contribute

In today's implementation (2.11.0, 3.9.0), the deserialization and serialization of JSON Schemas is effectively hard-coded to 2020-12. However, starting with OpenAPI 3.1, people can set the $schema property of any given schema to a different dialect (default being documented here. This entails a couple of things: parsing that keyword first if it exists, or falling back on the document dialect property, or falling back to the default value for the OpenAPI version. if that value is known (like https://spec.openapis.org/oas/3.1/dialect/base using the parsing logic associated with that entry if that value is unknown, we need to load the corresponding schema, and read its schema (recursively) until we find a known value. (note be careful of the security considerations here) Note: ideally we'd make the OpenAPISchema type generic and allow the caller to provide new registrations of schemas uris with the corresponding parsing logic and data type, but that'd introduce major breaking changes,

📅 Opened Jul 16, 2026💬 5 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Describe the bug The OpenApiVisitorBase.PathString is documented as 'Pointer to source of validation error in document', but when used with OpenApiWalker and the built-in validation system, it does not produce correct pointers when the input document is in the v2 format. This is because the walker operates on the shared data model which mirrors the v3 structure - which has already been manipulated by the v2 reader. OpenApi File To Reproduce { "swagger": "2.0", "info": { "title": "Test API", "version": "1.0.0" }, "paths": { "/items": { "get": { "responses": { "200": { "description": "OK", "schema": { "type": "object", "properties": { "id": { "type": "integer" }, "name"

📅 Opened Apr 2, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more C# beginner tasks?Explore C# GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for microsoft/OpenAPI.NET

When evaluating whether to contribute to microsoft/OpenAPI.NET, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of microsoft/OpenAPI.NET acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 88.3% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to microsoft/OpenAPI.NET

01

Is microsoft/OpenAPI.NET welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

microsoft/OpenAPI.NET has a recorded first-timer success rate of 83.3%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 71.5 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 71.5 places microsoft/OpenAPI.NET in the Elite tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for microsoft/OpenAPI.NET?

The external pull request merge rate is 88.3%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in microsoft/OpenAPI.NET?

Yes, microsoft/OpenAPI.NET currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for microsoft/OpenAPI.NET are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.