micromatch/picomatch - Open Source PR Review Scorecard
Blazing fast and accurate glob matcher written JavaScript, with no dependencies and full support for standard and extended Bash glob features, including braces, extglobs, POSIX brackets, and regular expressions. Used by GraphQL, Jest, Astro, Snowpack, Storybook, bulma, Serverless, fdir, Netlify, AWS Amplify, Revogrid, rollup, routify, open-wc, imba, ava, docusaurus, fast-glob, globby, chokidar, anymatch, cloudflare/miniflare, pts, and more than 5 million projects! Please follow picomatch's author: https://github.com/jonschlinkert
C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 53/100
External PR Merge Rate: 47%
Response Time: 18h
First Timer Success: 50%
Frequently Asked Questions
Is micromatch/picomatch welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?
micromatch/picomatch has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.
How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?
Maintainers in micromatch/picomatch respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 17.7 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.
What does the 52.7 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?
The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 52.7 places micromatch/picomatch in the B tier.
What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for micromatch/picomatch?
The external contributor pull request merge rate for micromatch/picomatch is 46.7%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.
Are there Good First Issues available in micromatch/picomatch?
micromatch/picomatch does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.
Blazing fast and accurate glob matcher written JavaScript, with no dependencies and full support for standard and extended Bash glob features, including braces, extglobs, POSIX brackets, and regular expressions. Used by GraphQL, Jest, Astro, Snowpack, Storybook, bulma, Serverless, fdir, Netlify, AWS Amplify, Revogrid, rollup, routify, open-wc, imba, ava, docusaurus, fast-glob, globby, chokidar, anymatch, cloudflare/miniflare, pts, and more than 5 million projects! Please follow picomatch's author: https://github.com/jonschlinkert
Maintainer review activity heatmap & prime window prediction
Monday - WednesdayLimited Sample Size
Peak Review Hour
11:00 UTC
Calculating local time...
Primary Window
11:00 - 15:00 UTC
Calculating local time...
Active Maintainers
5 Tracked
Detected: UTC
24-Hour Maintainer Activity Heatmap (UTC)
LowPeak
00:0006:0012:0018:0023:00
Maintainers are most responsive around 11:00 UTC (11:00 UTC in your timezone). Recommended submission window is Monday - Wednesday from 11:00 to 15:00 UTC (11:00 - 15:00 UTC local).
PR Size vs Review Speed
Best Pull Request Size for micromatch/picomatch
Sweet Spot: < 150 lines
Small (<150 LOC)Recommended
12havg review
58% Merge Approval
Medium (150–500 LOC)Normal
1.1davg review
44% Merge Approval
Large (>500 LOC)Slow
3.5davg review
21% Merge Approval
Maintainer Strategy: Maintainer Sweet Spot: PRs under 150 lines merge in ~12 hours (58% approval). Large PRs (>500 lines) take ~85 hours (21% approval). Keep your diff compact for rapid review.
Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.
Have you contributed to this repo?
Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.
3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness
Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for micromatch/picomatch
When evaluating whether to contribute to micromatch/picomatch, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.
Currently, maintainers of micromatch/picomatch acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 17 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 46.7% were successfully merged into the primary branch.
Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to micromatch/picomatch
01
Is micromatch/picomatch welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?
micromatch/picomatch has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.
02
How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?
The initial maintainer response time averages ~17 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.
03
What does the 52.7 C-Rank™ score represent?
The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 52.7 places micromatch/picomatch in the Solid tier.
04
What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for micromatch/picomatch?
The external pull request merge rate is 46.7%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.
05
Are there beginner Good First Issues open in micromatch/picomatch?
micromatch/picomatch does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.
GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard
All metrics displayed for micromatch/picomatch are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.