matrix.org public website
C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 63/100
External PR Merge Rate: 77%
Response Time: 2d
First Timer Success: 81%
matrix-org/matrix.org has a recorded first-timer success rate of 81.3%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.
Maintainers in matrix-org/matrix.org respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 44.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.
The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 63.0 places matrix-org/matrix.org in the A tier.
The external contributor pull request merge rate for matrix-org/matrix.org is 77.1%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.
matrix-org/matrix.org currently has 28 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".
Highly welcoming maintainers in matrix-org/matrix.org. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.
Average Response Latency
Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.
External Acceptance Rate
Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.
First PR Conversion
Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.
Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.
[](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/matrix-org/matrix.org?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)
Historical health & responsiveness evolution
External PR acceptance
First PR success rate
50% receive response in
90% receive response in
Maintainer review activity heatmap & prime window prediction
Calculating local time...
Calculating local time...
Detected: UTC
Maintainers are most responsive around 16:00 UTC (16:00 UTC in your timezone). Recommended submission window is Tuesday - Thursday from 14:00 to 18:00 UTC (14:00 - 18:00 UTC local).
Limited recent maintainer review activity recorded for this repository. Prediction based on heuristic baseline.
Maintainer Strategy: Maintainer Sweet Spot: PRs under 150 lines merge in ~29 hours (96% approval). Large PRs (>500 lines) take ~211 hours (35% approval). Keep your diff compact for rapid review.
Enter your branch size and test coverage below to forecast review turnaround and get 1-click git splitting commands.
Alternative open-source projects with active maintainers in JavaScript.
Open database of 3,400+ CCTV camera specs across 77+ brands — searchable, filterable, CC0
Global MapleStory Server BeiDou(冒险岛GMS服务端北斗)
The main NotePlan repository, which contains the source code for all NotePlan plugins. If a release entry has been created, it will be available for installation from within NotePlan application.
In templates/skel.html <meta name="twitter:widgets:csp" content="on" /> <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image" /> <meta name="twitter:site" content="@matrixdotorg" /> <meta name="twitter:creator" content="@matrixdotorg" /> <meta name="twitter:image" ...> The Matrix.org Foundation is no longer active on X. The twitter: card-specific meta tags were long ago largely ignored (on the Twitter side) in favour of equivalent OpenGraph og: tags1. arguably it could be worth keeping summary_large_image on its own, otherwise the Twitter Cards engine falls back to og:type of website which might be a smaller card / not-media-forward, but I'm ambivalent on this. The twitter:widgets:csp tag was only for telling embedded Tweets to work with CSP. There are no such embeds anywhere on the site so this is superfluous code anyway. I'd be in favour of dropping all of these these redundant tags - they no longer add any useful value that I can identify. Footnotes side-note, I'm super curiou
Project Affected https://matrix.org/ecosystem/servers/ Current Information Telodendria Repository Link: https://git.telodendria.io/Telodendria/Telodendria Suggested Correction Replace or delete the Repository link. Source No response Additional Context No response
Move OOYE (Out Of Your Element) to the recommended spot on the discord bridge page due to OOYE being the most advance and stable matrix <-> discord bridge
It's a client available for iPhone and iPad and may work on macOS, but that hasn't been verified. See: https://mszpro.com/neo Please note, whilst it shares the same name, this isn't related to the other Neo client.
I noticed the "close" x in the lightbox is always top right of the screen, i.e. sometimes very far from the actual image or even over it's border. Could maybe improve the placement some time. Also the lightbox seems to make it into browsing history, so browser navigation after checking out all the lightboxes is pretty annoying. Originally posted by @HarHarLinks in #3239 (review)
Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.
Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.
When evaluating whether to contribute to matrix-org/matrix.org, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.
Currently, maintainers of matrix-org/matrix.org acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 77.1% were successfully merged into the primary branch.
matrix-org/matrix.org has a recorded first-timer success rate of 81.3%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.
The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.
The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 63.0 places matrix-org/matrix.org in the Welcoming tier.
The external pull request merge rate is 77.1%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.
Yes, matrix-org/matrix.org currently has 28 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.
All metrics displayed for matrix-org/matrix.org are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.