llmmanorg/llmman - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Run any agent on any model, models stored as OCI images

C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 69/100

External PR Merge Rate: 58%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is llmmanorg/llmman welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

llmmanorg/llmman has a recorded first-timer success rate of 62.5%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in llmmanorg/llmman respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 69.3 C-Rank™ score (S Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 69.3 places llmmanorg/llmman in the S tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for llmmanorg/llmman?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for llmmanorg/llmman is 58.3%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in llmmanorg/llmman?

llmmanorg/llmman currently has 9 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

llmmanorg
llmmanorg/llmmanS•Elite548
GitHub
Back to Explorer
llmmanorg

llmmanorg/llmman

548
Active (30d)S•Elite(69/100)Rust

Run any agent on any model, models stored as OCI images

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Architecture Gatekeeper

Warmth Score
6.9/10
Patience Score
7.6/10
Nitpick Rate
50%

Strict review standards in llmmanorg/llmman. Ensure PR scope matches issue requirements closely before requesting review.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in llmmanorg/llmman focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add or update tests for changed behavior before requesting review
  • •Update docs or README when behavior changes
  • •Keep PRs small and focused on one change

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not leave requested test coverage unresolved
  • •Do not ship user-facing changes without matching docs
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors with feature work
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
58.3%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
62.5%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
17 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
58.3%
Merge Gauge
62.5%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe42/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for llmmanorg/llmman
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/llmmanorg/llmman)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/llmmanorg/llmman?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Models can be huge terabytes or greater. It is easy for models to fill up disks. Before pulling a model, check can the disk fit it before pulling. Might be worth seeing if there is prior art in docker/podman/llama.cpp/ollama.

📅 Opened Oct 8, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 75/100Contribute

llmman should provide an explicit, per-invocation way to supply a Hugging Face token (CLI flag + Web UI) so that baked models whose weights come from gated or private Hugging Face repositories can be pulled.

📅 Opened Oct 6, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 75/100Contribute

https://github.com/antirez/ds4

📅 Opened Oct 4, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 75/100Contribute

When I run llmman serve, the final line of the output tells me llmman serve listening on 127.0.0.1:17434 If you change that to llmman serve listening on http://127.0.0.1:17434 many terminal emulators, including the two I use most often on Linux, Konsole and ghostty, can treat it as an active link, and I can open it in the browser with `CTRL-mouse click.

📅 Opened Sep 29, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 100/100Contribute

So: llmman run hf.co/unsloth/Qwen-Image-2.1-GGUF "A manatee in a sunlit lagoon" just works.

📅 Opened Sep 22, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 75/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for llmmanorg/llmman

When evaluating whether to contribute to llmmanorg/llmman, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of llmmanorg/llmman acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 58.3% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to llmmanorg/llmman

01

Is llmmanorg/llmman welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

llmmanorg/llmman has a recorded first-timer success rate of 62.5%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 69.3 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 69.3 places llmmanorg/llmman in the Elite tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for llmmanorg/llmman?

The external pull request merge rate is 58.3%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in llmmanorg/llmman?

Yes, llmmanorg/llmman currently has 9 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for llmmanorg/llmman are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.