linera-io/linera-protocol - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Main repository for the Linera protocol

C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 74/100

External PR Merge Rate: 84%

Response Time: 2d

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is linera-io/linera-protocol welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

linera-io/linera-protocol has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in linera-io/linera-protocol respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 54.1 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 73.7 C-Rank™ score (S Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 73.7 places linera-io/linera-protocol in the S tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for linera-io/linera-protocol?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for linera-io/linera-protocol is 84.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in linera-io/linera-protocol?

linera-io/linera-protocol currently has 5 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

linera-io
linera-io/linera-protocolSElite32.1k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
linera-io

linera-io/linera-protocol

32,131
SElite(74/100)Rust

Main repository for the Linera protocol

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
8.1/10
Patience Score
8.4/10
Nitpick Rate
30%

Highly welcoming maintainers in linera-io/linera-protocol. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
2 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
84.0%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
5 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
84.0%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe64/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for linera-io/linera-protocol
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/linera-io/linera-protocol)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/linera-io/linera-protocol?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Parent tracker: #6107 Summary Introduce madsim (Rust async runtime with deterministic simulation, drop-in tokio-compatible) to linera-core's test harness. Start with one representative test, validate determinism, expand module-by-module. Motivation Several recent bug classes would have been catchable — and reproducible via seed replay — under deterministic simulation testing (DST): The cluster of correctness fixes following the #5790 chain-actors refactor: cancellation safety (#6056 merged; #6051 closed and superseded), Arc lifecycle in storage cache (#6046), save-failure handling (#6053), load-failure handling (#6015). The 2026-04-12 Conway incident combining TTL inversion (#5991) with silent OTLP queue drops. The cross-chain mpsc-loss issue on pod kill (see investigation-cross-chain-crash-safety.md). multileader-stuck-round consensus stall. Shared shape: a race / cancellation / ordering pattern reachable only under specific scheduling that normal tokio tests rarely produce. DST

📅 Opened Apr 23, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute

Parent: #5977 (Tier 1 item 4) Problem The colored crate is used to emit ANSI escape codes in the linera CLI output. Two concrete issues: ANSI codes leak to stdout in net up (linera-service/src/cli/net_up_utils.rs:311-330). The command prints shell export statements wrapped in .bold(), which emit ANSI escape codes when rendered. Stdout should always be clean text suitable for parsing or piping — never formatted. NO_COLOR / CLICOLOR environment variables are not explicitly honored. The colored crate auto-detects TTY but its behavior when piped is not guaranteed to produce clean output, and there's no documented environment override. Relevant existing usages: linera-service/src/cli/net_up_utils.rs:6 — use colored::Colorize as _; linera-service/src/cli/net_up_utils.rs:317,325,329 — .bold() calls on stdout println!s for export LINERA_WALLET=... etc. linera-service/src/cli/main.rs:36 — use colored::Colorize; linera-service/src/cli/main.rs:1473 — info!("{}", "Application created

📅 Opened Apr 11, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute

Parent: #5977 (Tier 1 item 3) Problem Three CLI commands print Rust Debug format output, which: Uses Rust struct syntax (Foo { field: "value" }), not a standard data format. Is inconsistent with the rest of the CLI, which uses Display or serde_json::to_string_pretty. Is harder for scripts and agents to parse reliably than JSON or plain text. Changes shape across Rust versions (not technically stable). Affected lines All in linera-service/src/cli/main.rs: Line 1393 — ListEventsFromIndex: println!("{:#?}", index_events); Line 1751 — Chain(ChainCommand::ShowBlock { .. }): println!("{:#?}", block); Line 1768 — Chain(ChainCommand::ShowChainDescription { .. }): println!("{:#?}", description); Proposed fix Replace with serde_json::to_string_pretty. Both underlying types already derive Serialize: ConfirmedBlock at linera-chain/src/block.rs:80 (#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize, Allocative)]) ChainDescription at linera-base/src/data_types.rs:890 (#[deriv

📅 Opened Apr 11, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute

We use integers as keys in many places (procotol and examples) but usually without a custom key serialization. As a result, graphql queries show keys ordered by little-endian bytes. See AskPrice and BidPrice in the matching engine example.

📅 Opened Mar 5, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 15/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for linera-io/linera-protocol

When evaluating whether to contribute to linera-io/linera-protocol, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of linera-io/linera-protocol acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 2 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 84.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to linera-io/linera-protocol

01

Is linera-io/linera-protocol welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

linera-io/linera-protocol has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~2 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 73.7 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 73.7 places linera-io/linera-protocol in the Elite tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for linera-io/linera-protocol?

The external pull request merge rate is 84.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in linera-io/linera-protocol?

Yes, linera-io/linera-protocol currently has 5 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for linera-io/linera-protocol are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.