letsencrypt/boulder - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

An ACME-based certificate authority, written in Go.

C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 72/100

External PR Merge Rate: 81%

Response Time: 5h

First Timer Success: 80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is letsencrypt/boulder welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

letsencrypt/boulder has a recorded first-timer success rate of 80.0%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in letsencrypt/boulder respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 5.2 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 71.8 C-Rank™ score (S Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 71.8 places letsencrypt/boulder in the S tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for letsencrypt/boulder?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for letsencrypt/boulder is 81.5%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in letsencrypt/boulder?

letsencrypt/boulder currently has 5 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

letsencrypt
letsencrypt/boulderS•Elite5.8k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
letsencrypt

letsencrypt/boulder

5,757
InactiveS•Elite(72/100)Go

An ACME-based certificate authority, written in Go.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Constructive Code Reviewer

Warmth Score
7.7/10
Patience Score
8.1/10
Nitpick Rate
28%

Balanced & professional review environment in letsencrypt/boulder. Maintains strict focus on technical quality and test standards.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Use conventional commit messages and clean branch names
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
5 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
81.5%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
80.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
14 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
81.5%
Merge Gauge
80.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe83/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for letsencrypt/boulder
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/letsencrypt/boulder)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/letsencrypt/boulder?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

Wait for IN-12738 to be completed. Once we've successfully set this in Production we can make this field required and also remove the guard against it being empty in *WebFrontEndImpl.prepChallengeForDisplay().

📅 Opened Apr 21, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 45/100Contribute

This is an issue I have asked Claude to put together as a result of its audit of Boulder against the RFCs Boulder implements. Checklist of cases where Boulder emits a field the RFC defines but its meaning, status code, or population logic diverges from the spec. Distinct from the "non-standard fields to remove" and "missing fields to add" lists — every item here is a field Boulder already implements and already sends on the wire, but with the wrong semantics. unauthorized problem returns HTTP 403 instead of 401 for deactivated accounts. RFC 8555 §7.3.6: "If a server receives a POST or POST-as-GET from a deactivated account, it MUST return an error response with status code 401 (Unauthorized) and type urn:ietf:params:acme:error:unauthorized." Boulder's Unauthorized helper hardcodes http.StatusForbidden, and the JWS verification layer raises berrors.UnauthorizedError for deactivated accounts, which the web layer maps to HTTP 403. The type URN is correct; the status code is not. Dea

📅 Opened Apr 11, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 20/100Contribute
Looking for more Go beginner tasks?Explore Go GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for letsencrypt/boulder

When evaluating whether to contribute to letsencrypt/boulder, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of letsencrypt/boulder acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 5 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 81.5% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to letsencrypt/boulder

01

Is letsencrypt/boulder welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

letsencrypt/boulder has a recorded first-timer success rate of 80.0%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~5 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 71.8 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 71.8 places letsencrypt/boulder in the Elite tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for letsencrypt/boulder?

The external pull request merge rate is 81.5%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in letsencrypt/boulder?

Yes, letsencrypt/boulder currently has 5 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for letsencrypt/boulder are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.