learningequality/kolibri - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Kolibri Learning Platform: the offline app for universal education

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 63/100

External PR Merge Rate: 75%

Response Time: 2d

First Timer Success: 46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is learningequality/kolibri welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

learningequality/kolibri has a recorded first-timer success rate of 46.2%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in learningequality/kolibri respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 44.3 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 63.2 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 63.2 places learningequality/kolibri in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for learningequality/kolibri?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for learningequality/kolibri is 74.7%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in learningequality/kolibri?

learningequality/kolibri currently has 14 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

learningequality
learningequality/kolibriA•Welcoming1.1k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
learningequality

learningequality/kolibri

1,129
InactiveA•Welcoming(63/100)Python

Kolibri Learning Platform: the offline app for universal education

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
8.3/10
Patience Score
8.6/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Highly welcoming maintainers in learningequality/kolibri. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
1 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
74.7%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
46.2%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
28 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
74.7%
Merge Gauge
46.2%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe44/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for learningequality/kolibri
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/learningequality/kolibri)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/learningequality/kolibri?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

🙂 Looking for an issue? Welcome! This issue is open for contribution. If this is the first time you’re requesting an issue, please: Read Contributing guidelines carefully. Pay extra attention to Using generative AI. Pull requests and comments that don’t follow the guidelines won’t be answered. Confirm that you’ve read the guidelines in your comment. Overview Replace the 12 $computedClass calls in 7 QTI, media player and EPUB viewer components with <style> block rules. Follow the Guidance and Strategy in the parent issue. Complexity: Medium Target branch: develop The Change qti_viewer/frontend/components/interactions/InlineChoiceInteraction.vue qti_viewer/frontend/components/interactions/SimpleChoice.vue qti_viewer/frontend/components/interactions/TextEntryInteraction.vue media_player/frontend/views/AudioPlayer.vue media_player/frontend/views/AudioPlayerControls.vue (5 calls) media_player/frontend/views/MediaPlayerTranscript/TranscriptCue.vue epub_viewer/frontend/views/S

📅 Opened Oct 9, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

🙂 Looking for an issue? Welcome! This issue is open for contribution. If this is the first time you’re requesting an issue, please: Read Contributing guidelines carefully. Pay extra attention to Using generative AI. Pull requests and comments that don’t follow the guidelines won’t be answered. Confirm that you’ve read the guidelines in your comment. Overview Replace the 6 $computedClass calls in the 4 picture password components with <style> block rules. Follow the Guidance and Strategy in the parent issue. Complexity: Low Target branch: develop The Change kolibri/plugins/user_auth/frontend/views/SignInPage/PictureSignIn/PicturePasswordConfirmModal.vue kolibri/plugins/user_auth/frontend/views/SignInPage/PictureSignIn/PicturePasswordGrid.vue kolibri/plugins/user_auth/frontend/views/SignInPage/PictureSignIn/PicturePasswordOption.vue packages/kolibri-common/components/UserPicturePassword.vue Acceptance Criteria No $computedClass call remains in these components. Hover,

📅 Opened Oct 9, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

🙂 Looking for an issue? Welcome! This issue is open for contribution. If this is the first time you’re requesting an issue, please: Read Contributing guidelines carefully. Pay extra attention to Using generative AI. Pull requests and comments that don’t follow the guidelines won’t be answered. Confirm that you’ve read the guidelines in your comment. Target branch: develop Observed behavior the masterylog diff endpoint returns a 500 when either of the two tries it compares has a null time_spent time_spent is null on purpose for tries recorded before logger migration 0011 Errors and logs File "kolibri/core/logger/viewsets/mastery_log.py", line 109, in diff "time_spent": target_try["time_spent"] - previous_try["time_spent"], TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for -: 'float' and 'NoneType' Expected behavior the diff loads and the time_spent difference is null when one of the values is unknown User-facing consequences coaches and learners cant open the quiz or exerci

📅 Opened Oct 7, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

🙂 Looking for an issue? Welcome! This issue is open for contribution. If this is the first time you’re requesting an issue, please: Read Contributing guidelines carefully. Pay extra attention to Using generative AI. Pull requests and comments that don’t follow the guidelines won’t be answered. Confirm that you’ve read the guidelines in your comment. Overview Loading or refreshing the Coach "Edit lesson details" or quiz preview URL renders the lesson or quiz summary page instead. Navigating there from within the app works, so the bug shows on reload, on a bookmarked or shared link, and when the browser restores a tab. Complexity: Low Target branch: develop Context The LESSON_SUMMARY route CLASS + LESSON + '/:tabId?' (lessonsRoutes.js#L86) is declared before CLASS + LESSON + '/edit' (#L145), so /edit resolves to LESSON_SUMMARY with tabId: 'edit'. EXAM_SUMMARY's CLASS + QUIZ + '/:tabId?' (examRoutes.js#L165) shadows CLASS + QUIZ + '/preview' (#L198) the same way. The Chan

📅 Opened Oct 4, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

🙂 Looking for an issue? Welcome! This issue is open for contribution. If this is the first time you’re requesting an issue, please: Read Contributing guidelines carefully. Pay extra attention to Using generative AI. Pull requests and comments that don’t follow the guidelines won’t be answered. Confirm that you’ve read the guidelines in your comment. Overview getLearningActivityIcon is defined twice in kolibri-common. The useLearningActivities composable's version returns Solid icons, and utils/learningActivityIcon.js returns Shaded icons. The two should become one function in the composable. Complexity: Low Target branch: develop Context useLearningActivities.js maps a learning activity value (e.g. 'UD5UGM0z') to a Solid icon name (watchSolid). learningActivityIcon.js derives a Shaded icon name (watchShaded) from a learning activity key (e.g. 'WATCH'), with EXPLORE mapping to interactShaded. The Change getLearningActivityIcon in useLearningActivities should take an op

📅 Opened Oct 4, 2026💬 6 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for learningequality/kolibri

When evaluating whether to contribute to learningequality/kolibri, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of learningequality/kolibri acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 74.7% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to learningequality/kolibri

01

Is learningequality/kolibri welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

learningequality/kolibri has a recorded first-timer success rate of 46.2%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 63.2 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 63.2 places learningequality/kolibri in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for learningequality/kolibri?

The external pull request merge rate is 74.7%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in learningequality/kolibri?

Yes, learningequality/kolibri currently has 14 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for learningequality/kolibri are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.