leanprover/cslib - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

The Lean Computer Science Library (CSLib)

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 62/100

External PR Merge Rate: 36%

Response Time: 2h

First Timer Success: 33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is leanprover/cslib welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

leanprover/cslib has a recorded first-timer success rate of 33.3%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in leanprover/cslib respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 2.2 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 61.5 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 61.5 places leanprover/cslib in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for leanprover/cslib?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for leanprover/cslib is 36.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in leanprover/cslib?

leanprover/cslib currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

leanprover
leanprover/cslibA•Welcoming658
GitHub
Back to Explorer
leanprover

leanprover/cslib

658
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(62/100)LELean

The Lean Computer Science Library (CSLib)

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Active maintainer team in leanprover/cslib welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with repository style conventions
  • •Keep PRs focused and well-documented

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • •Do not break existing automated test suites
Response Velocity
2 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
36.0%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
33.3%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
34 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
36.0%
Merge Gauge
33.3%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe53/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for leanprover/cslib
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/leanprover/cslib)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/leanprover/cslib?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

Binding in lambda calculi is notoriously prone to error, and isn't a problem where formalization is an immediate defense because this is a question of correct definitions. Especially because we will have multiple implementations of binding, I'd like to have a set of tests that give us a bit more confidence that we've written the correct definitions. I'd like to start with the existing locally nameless STLC and port something like what exists at https://github.com/sweirich/lambda-n-ways into a suite of tests. Help is welcome with this issue since I have somewhat limited time at the moment.

📅 Opened Jul 12, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute
Looking for more Lean beginner tasks?Explore Lean GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for leanprover/cslib

When evaluating whether to contribute to leanprover/cslib, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of leanprover/cslib acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 2 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 36.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to leanprover/cslib

01

Is leanprover/cslib welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

leanprover/cslib has a recorded first-timer success rate of 33.3%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~2 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 61.5 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 61.5 places leanprover/cslib in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for leanprover/cslib?

The external pull request merge rate is 36.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in leanprover/cslib?

Yes, leanprover/cslib currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for leanprover/cslib are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.