langgenius/mosoo - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

The open-source Agent Gallery and Gateway for Codex, Claude Agent SDK, and OpenCode. Developers publish an Agent once behind one HTTP API; users run it in an isolated cloud sandbox—no local harness setup, compute, or runtime infrastructure.

C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 70/100

External PR Merge Rate: 71%

Response Time: 3h

First Timer Success: 75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is langgenius/mosoo welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

langgenius/mosoo has a recorded first-timer success rate of 75.0%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in langgenius/mosoo respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 2.8 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 70.2 C-Rank™ score (S Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 70.2 places langgenius/mosoo in the S tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for langgenius/mosoo?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for langgenius/mosoo is 71.1%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in langgenius/mosoo?

langgenius/mosoo does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

langgenius
langgenius/mosooS•Elite127
GitHub
Back to Explorer
langgenius

langgenius/mosoo

127
Active (30d)S•Elite(70/100)TypeScript

The open-source Agent Gallery and Gateway for Codex, Claude Agent SDK, and OpenCode. Developers publish an Agent once behind one HTTP API; users run it in an isolated cloud sandbox—no local harness setup, compute, or runtime infrastructure.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Architecture Gatekeeper

Warmth Score
6.4/10
Patience Score
7.4/10
Nitpick Rate
45%

Strict review standards in langgenius/mosoo. Ensure PR scope matches issue requirements closely before requesting review.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in langgenius/mosoo focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Call out API, migration, or compatibility impact clearly
  • •Update docs or README when behavior changes
  • •Add or update tests for changed behavior before requesting review

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not hide breaking changes in implementation details
  • •Do not ship user-facing changes without matching docs
  • •Do not leave requested test coverage unresolved
Response Velocity
2 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
71.1%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
75.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
7 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
71.1%
Merge Gauge
75.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe79/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for langgenius/mosoo
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/langgenius/mosoo)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/langgenius/mosoo?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

Area API Summary Mosoo can revoke a bound Agent capability when its Deployment is deleted through Mosoo, but it cannot currently detect a Cloudflare Pages/Worker resource deleted directly through the Cloudflare dashboard or API. D1 can therefore still describe the Deployment and its public binding as live, and the previously issued capability URL can continue to start bound Sessions/Runs. This is control-plane drift. It is intentionally separate from #287 / #317, which close the Mosoo-managed deletion, unbind, and successful-version-rollover paths. Steps to reproduce Deploy an App with a public bound Agent and retain its generated capability URL. Delete the corresponding Pages/Worker resource directly through Cloudflare, without calling the Mosoo deployment deletion flow. Do not alter Mosoo D1 deployment state. Submit a request to the retained capability URL. The exact Cloudflare-console action cannot be reproduced in this local environment because it requires a real remote CF accoun

📅 Opened Jul 14, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more TypeScript beginner tasks?Explore TypeScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for langgenius/mosoo

When evaluating whether to contribute to langgenius/mosoo, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of langgenius/mosoo acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 2 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 71.1% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to langgenius/mosoo

01

Is langgenius/mosoo welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

langgenius/mosoo has a recorded first-timer success rate of 75.0%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~2 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 70.2 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 70.2 places langgenius/mosoo in the Elite tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for langgenius/mosoo?

The external pull request merge rate is 71.1%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in langgenius/mosoo?

langgenius/mosoo does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for langgenius/mosoo are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.