lampa-app/LAMPA - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

LAMPA client browser for Android 4.1+ (API level 16+)

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 50/100

External PR Merge Rate: 64%

Response Time: 12h

First Timer Success: 33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is lampa-app/LAMPA welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

lampa-app/LAMPA has a recorded first-timer success rate of 33.3%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in lampa-app/LAMPA respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 11.6 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 50.5 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 50.5 places lampa-app/LAMPA in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for lampa-app/LAMPA?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for lampa-app/LAMPA is 63.6%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in lampa-app/LAMPA?

lampa-app/LAMPA does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

lampa-app
lampa-app/LAMPABSolid683
GitHub
Back to Explorer
lampa-app

lampa-app/LAMPA

683
BSolid(50/100)Kotlin

LAMPA client browser for Android 4.1+ (API level 16+)

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Constructive Code Reviewer

Warmth Score
7.4/10
Patience Score
7.8/10
Nitpick Rate
33%

Balanced & professional review environment in lampa-app/LAMPA. Maintains strict focus on technical quality and test standards.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Verify all existing package test suites run cleanly
  • Use conventional commit messages and clean branch names
  • Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
11 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
63.6%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
33.3%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
1 core
Single maintainer review bottleneck
Diagnostic Health HUD
63.6%
Merge Gauge
33.3%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe57/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for lampa-app/LAMPA
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/lampa-app/LAMPA)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/lampa-app/LAMPA?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (0)

View on GitHub

No cached good first issues currently tracked for lampa-app/LAMPA.

View all good first issues directly on GitHub

Looking for more Kotlin beginner tasks?Explore Kotlin GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for lampa-app/LAMPA

When evaluating whether to contribute to lampa-app/LAMPA, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of lampa-app/LAMPA acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 11 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 63.6% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to lampa-app/LAMPA

01

Is lampa-app/LAMPA welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

lampa-app/LAMPA has a recorded first-timer success rate of 33.3%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~11 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 50.5 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 50.5 places lampa-app/LAMPA in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for lampa-app/LAMPA?

The external pull request merge rate is 63.6%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in lampa-app/LAMPA?

lampa-app/LAMPA does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for lampa-app/LAMPA are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.