labsai/EDDI - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Config-driven engine that turns JSON into production-grade AI agents. Multi-agent orchestration, 12+ LLM providers, MCP/A2A protocols, RAG, persistent memory, and enterprise compliance (EU AI Act, GDPR, HIPAA). Built on Quarkus.

C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 71/100

External PR Merge Rate: 84%

Response Time: 10h

First Timer Success: 71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is labsai/EDDI welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

labsai/EDDI has a recorded first-timer success rate of 71.4%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in labsai/EDDI respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 10.2 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 70.8 C-Rank™ score (S Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 70.8 places labsai/EDDI in the S tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for labsai/EDDI?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for labsai/EDDI is 83.6%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in labsai/EDDI?

labsai/EDDI currently has 16 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

labsai
labsai/EDDISElite365
GitHub
Back to Explorer
labsai

labsai/EDDI

365
SElite(71/100)Java

Config-driven engine that turns JSON into production-grade AI agents. Multi-agent orchestration, 12+ LLM providers, MCP/A2A protocols, RAG, persistent memory, and enterprise compliance (EU AI Act, GDPR, HIPAA). Built on Quarkus.

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.7/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
30%

Collaborative maintainer environment in labsai/EDDI. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
10 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
83.6%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
71.4%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
9 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
83.6%
Merge Gauge
71.4%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe77/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for labsai/EDDI
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/labsai/EDDI)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/labsai/EDDI?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Problem / Motivation WhatsApp (2B+ users globally) is the dominant messaging platform for customer engagement in APAC, LATAM, Europe, and Africa. EDDI's conversational agents can power customer support, sales qualification, and onboarding workflows via WhatsApp Business. Note: WhatsApp Business API is primarily 1:1 (business-to-customer). A Groups API exists for Official Business Accounts (max 8 participants), but it is a restricted, premium feature - not the standard use case. The initial adapter should support AGENT targets only. GROUP target support via the Groups API can be a future enhancement. Key WhatsApp constraints: Primarily 1:1 - Standard use case is business-to-customer direct messaging Groups API - Exists but requires Official Business Account (OBA) status, max 8 participants 24-hour messaging window - Businesses can only send free-form messages within 24 hours of the customer's last message. Outside this window, only pre-approved message templates are allowed. Cloud AP

📅 Opened Jun 30, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Problem / Motivation Microsoft Teams (320M+ monthly active users) is the dominant enterprise communication platform. EDDI's multi-agent orchestration capabilities - especially group discussions with debate, peer review, and round table styles - are a natural fit for enterprise Teams channels. WARNING: Teams has the most complex authentication model of all target platforms. The Bot Framework uses Azure AD JWT tokens for incoming message verification, requiring OpenID metadata fetching, key rotation handling, and multi-claim validation. Plan for this complexity. Key Teams constraints: No threading in Group Chats - Threads (reply chains) are only supported in Channels. Group Chats are flat message streams. Multi-agent debates MUST deploy in Channels. @mention-gated by default - Bots only receive messages when explicitly @mentioned unless Resource-Specific Consent (RSC) is configured with ChannelMessage.Read.Group permission. Adaptive Cards (v1.5) - Teams uses Adaptive Cards for rich fo

📅 Opened Jun 30, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute

Problem / Motivation Discord (200M+ monthly active users) is a major platform for developer communities, open-source projects, and increasingly enterprise teams. EDDI's multi-agent group discussions map naturally to Discord's channel + thread model. WARNING: Critical architectural difference from Slack: Discord's HTTP-based Interactions API only receives slash commands and component interactions (button clicks, select menus). Regular channel messages and thread replies require a persistent WebSocket Gateway connection. This fundamentally differs from Slack's pure HTTP Events API model. The recommended approach is a phased implementation. Architecture Principle No platform SDKs. All adapters use java.net.http.HttpClient + Jackson for raw HTTP/JSON - no JDA, no Discord4J. Every messaging platform's API is just REST under the hood. Raw HTTP keeps the dependency tree lean, the single-JAR deployment simple, and gives full control over retry logic, error handling, and message formatting.

📅 Opened Jun 30, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute

Problem / Motivation Telegram (950M+ monthly active users) is the architecturally closest platform to Slack for EDDI integration: HTTP webhook model - Telegram sends POST requests to a registered URL (identical to Slack's Events API) Simple secret verification - String comparison of X-Telegram-Bot-Api-Secret-Token header (simpler than Slack's HMAC-SHA256) Simple REST API - sendMessage, sendChatAction with JSON bodies Reply threading - reply_to_message_id creates visual reply chains Generous message limit - 4096 characters (vs Slack's ~4000) No OAuth complexity - Single bot token, no workspace/tenant scoping This makes Telegram the recommended first non-Slack adapter. Architecture Principle No platform SDKs. All adapters use java.net.http.HttpClient + Jackson for raw HTTP/JSON. No TelegramBots library. Every messaging platform's API is just REST under the hood. Raw HTTP keeps the dependency tree lean, the single-JAR deployment simple, and gives full control over retry logic, error ha

📅 Opened Jun 30, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute

Summary Three REST interfaces are missing core OpenAPI annotations that all other REST endpoints have. What to add Interface File What's missing IRestUserConversationStore engine/triggermanagement/IRestUserConversationStore.java @Operation on all 3 methods IRestHtmlChatResource ui/IRestHtmlChatResource.java @Operation on both methods ILogoutEndpoint engine/api/ILogoutEndpoint.java @Tag class-level annotation (methods already have @Operation) Pattern @Operation — add a summary field: @Operation(summary = "Read user conversation", description = "...") @Tag: @Tag(name = "Authentication") Tags should match an entry in src/main/java/ai/labs/eddi/configs/OpenApiConfig.java. If no matching tag exists, add one there too. Verify before starting: Confirm these annotations are still missing — the codebase may have been updated since this issue was filed. Acceptance criteria IRestUserConversationStore: all 3 methods have @Operation IRestHtmlChatResource: both methods have @O

📅 Opened Jun 19, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more Java beginner tasks?Explore Java GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for labsai/EDDI

When evaluating whether to contribute to labsai/EDDI, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of labsai/EDDI acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 10 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 83.6% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to labsai/EDDI

01

Is labsai/EDDI welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

labsai/EDDI has a recorded first-timer success rate of 71.4%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~10 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 70.8 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 70.8 places labsai/EDDI in the Elite tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for labsai/EDDI?

The external pull request merge rate is 83.6%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in labsai/EDDI?

Yes, labsai/EDDI currently has 16 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for labsai/EDDI are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.