kmolan/multicalc-rust - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Scientific computing that fits on a microcontroller. Estimation, control, kinematics, Lie groups, calculus, autodiff and linear algebra in stable no_std Rust with no heap, no panics and no unsafe. Run the same code on your laptop and your Cortex-M0.

C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 80/100

External PR Merge Rate: 88%

Response Time: 3h

First Timer Success: 77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is kmolan/multicalc-rust welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

kmolan/multicalc-rust has a recorded first-timer success rate of 76.9%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in kmolan/multicalc-rust respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 3.1 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 80.0 C-Rank™ score (S Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 80.0 places kmolan/multicalc-rust in the S tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for kmolan/multicalc-rust?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for kmolan/multicalc-rust is 87.8%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in kmolan/multicalc-rust?

kmolan/multicalc-rust currently has 43 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

kmolan
kmolan/multicalc-rustSElite182
GitHub
Back to Explorer
kmolan

kmolan/multicalc-rust

182
SElite(80/100)Rust

Scientific computing that fits on a microcontroller. Estimation, control, kinematics, Lie groups, calculus, autodiff and linear algebra in stable no_std Rust with no heap, no panics and no unsafe. Run the same code on your laptop and your Cortex-M0.

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
8.5/10
Patience Score
8.6/10
Nitpick Rate
30%

Highly welcoming maintainers in kmolan/multicalc-rust. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
3 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
87.8%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
76.9%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
20 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
87.8%
Merge Gauge
76.9%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe86/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for kmolan/multicalc-rust
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/kmolan/multicalc-rust)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/kmolan/multicalc-rust?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

What: the type carries mass, centre and rotational inertia, and offers inertia_about for a point. What the articulated-dynamics recursions will need is the 6x6 spatial matrix form, a transform to another frame combining the parallel-axis shift with a rotation, and the sum of two bodies' inertias. The last one already exists as open-coded arithmetic inside the MJCF loader, where synthesized_inertia weights the geom centres and sums the shifted tensors by hand — that duplication is the signal the operation belongs on the core type, and moving it also puts the parallel-axis term under the core crate's own tests. Where: crates/multicalc/src/spatial/inertia.rs, crates/multicalc-mjcf/src/body.rs. How to test: cargo test -p multicalc and cargo test -p multicalc-mjcf; assert transforming a body to a frame and back is the identity, that summing two halves of a split body reproduces the whole, and that the MJCF loader's results are unchanged after it switches to the shared operation.

📅 Opened Aug 9, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

What: the module docs say a filter is configured once, with the configuration checked up front, and that every call after that is total. The construction half is true, but none of MovingAverage, RunningMedian, SavitzkyGolay, Deadband, Hysteresis or SlewRateLimiter looks at the sample it is handed, so "total" here means "never panics", not "always returns a number" — and a reader takes the stronger meaning. The bar asks for the policy stated per module: which calls propagate silently, which check, and what a checked call returns. State it, and add the checked entry points issues 8 and 18 need. Where: crates/multicalc/src/signal_processing/mod.rs, and the doc comments on each filter. How to test: cargo test -p multicalc; the doctests carry the claims, so assert each stated behaviour with a non-finite sample in the module's own examples.

📅 Opened Aug 9, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 100/100Contribute

What: MultirotorMixer::new verifies that the allocation and its pseudo-inverse round-trip to the identity, comparing each entry against a hardcoded 1e-4. That is an absolute bar on a dimensionless quantity whose rounding scales with the allocation matrix's own magnitude, so a mixer with long arms and a small torque ratio is judged by a different standard than a compact one, and the same layout can pass at f64 and fail at f32. #229 makes the same argument for the finite-difference and Rk45 defaults. Express the bar in T::EPSILON terms scaled by the matrix norm. Where: crates/multicalc/src/plant/multirotor_mixing.rs. How to test: cargo test -p multicalc; assert the same set of layouts is accepted and rejected at f32 and f64, including one scaled up by a large factor.

📅 Opened Aug 9, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

What: solve_discrete_riccati and solve_discrete_lyapunov fix MAXIMUM_PASSES = 64 as a private constant and symmetric_eigendecomposition fixes max_sweeps = 60 as a local, so none of the three can be tuned and none states its budget in its signature. An iterative API should take a runtime budget with a documented default and a hard cap, which is what makes a worst-case execution time computable for a caller running these at startup on a target. Take the budget as an argument with the current values as the defaults, and report the passes taken on success so a marginal design is distinguishable from a comfortable one. Where: crates/multicalc/src/linear_algebra/riccati.rs, lyapunov.rs, symmetric_eigendecomposition.rs. How to test: cargo test -p multicalc; assert a problem needing more than a deliberately small budget reports DidNotConverge, and that the default budget reproduces every existing result.

📅 Opened Aug 9, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

What: low_pass and its three siblings refuse a frequency that reaches half the sampling rate, but magnitude_at, phase_at and delay_at accept any frequency at all and return the aliased answer for anything past it — a plot swept to the sampling rate mirrors back on itself with no indication, and a stability margin read off it at the wrong frequency is worse than no reading. The same three accessors on BiquadCascade inherit it. Return FrequencyOutOfRange the way the design constructors already do, and reject non-finite frequencies with it. Where: crates/multicalc/src/signal_processing/biquad.rs, cascade.rs. How to test: cargo test -p multicalc; assert each accessor refuses a frequency at and above Nyquist and agrees with today's values below it.

📅 Opened Aug 9, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for kmolan/multicalc-rust

When evaluating whether to contribute to kmolan/multicalc-rust, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of kmolan/multicalc-rust acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 3 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 87.8% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to kmolan/multicalc-rust

01

Is kmolan/multicalc-rust welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

kmolan/multicalc-rust has a recorded first-timer success rate of 76.9%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~3 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 80.0 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 80.0 places kmolan/multicalc-rust in the Elite tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for kmolan/multicalc-rust?

The external pull request merge rate is 87.8%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in kmolan/multicalc-rust?

Yes, kmolan/multicalc-rust currently has 43 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for kmolan/multicalc-rust are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.