kcp-dev/kcp - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Kubernetes-like control planes for form-factors and use-cases beyond Kubernetes and container workloads.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 66/100

External PR Merge Rate: 85%

Response Time: 4d

First Timer Success: 89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is kcp-dev/kcp welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

kcp-dev/kcp has a recorded first-timer success rate of 88.9%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in kcp-dev/kcp respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 103.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 66.4 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 66.4 places kcp-dev/kcp in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for kcp-dev/kcp?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for kcp-dev/kcp is 84.8%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in kcp-dev/kcp?

kcp-dev/kcp currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

kcp-dev
kcp-dev/kcpAWelcoming2.8k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
kcp-dev

kcp-dev/kcp

2,813
AWelcoming(66/100)Go

Kubernetes-like control planes for form-factors and use-cases beyond Kubernetes and container workloads.

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Architecture Gatekeeper

Warmth Score
7.3/10
Patience Score
8.0/10
Nitpick Rate
30%

Strict review standards in kcp-dev/kcp. Ensure PR scope matches issue requirements closely before requesting review.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
4 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
84.8%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
88.9%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
15 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
84.8%
Merge Gauge
88.9%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe61/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for kcp-dev/kcp
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/kcp-dev/kcp)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/kcp-dev/kcp?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (4)

View on GitHub

Feature Description #4077 implemented the proxy for terminating VW. Deletion of resources can take hours or even days depending on the process behind the CRs. E.g. if a database must get a full backup (as opposed to an incremental one) before being deleted and the database is quite large the CR can be kept in deletion for hours on end. An http.Transport is (iirc) quite heavy, so re-creating transports for every request can be very resource intensive. See: #4077 (comment) Also check if this needs to be implemented in the initializing VW. Proposed Solution Use shardlookup.TTLCache to a) synchronize parallel requests to create the same transport and b) cache the transport. When the workspace moves from terminating to deletion the transport can be evicted from the cache. Alternative Solutions No response Want to contribute? I would like to work on this issue. Additional Context No response

📅 Opened Apr 28, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

Problem Getting started with kcp for demos, feature development, or showcasing functionality requires significant manual setup. There's no fast path from zero to a working kcp environment with APIs, workspaces, and sample bindings. This is a friction point for: Contributors developing a new feature who need a fresh environment quickly Maintainers preparing conference demos or showcases Users evaluating kcp and wanting to see it in action without deep expertise Proposed Solution A dedicated quickstart CLI plugin (or kcp quickstart / kcp demo subcommand) that bootstraps a skeleton kcp environment in a few commands. What it should do # One-shot: spin up local kcp + bootstrap skeleton kcp quickstart # Or with a named scenario kcp quickstart --scenario api-provider # APIExport + sample CRD + workspace kcp quickstart --scenario multi-tenant # multiple workspaces, bindings, RBAC kcp quickstart --scenario gitops # kcp + flux/argocd integration skeleton The bootstrap should: Sta

📅 Opened Mar 26, 2026💬 7 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute

Feature Description Issue #3342 asks for changelogs for cli tools. Since #3379 PRs going into cli tools are tagged with area/cli. Proposed Solution Verify that since the move to monorepo PRs are still correctly tagged Check if we can produce a changelog just for cli tools without major maintenance Alternative Solutions No response Want to contribute? I would like to work on this issue. Additional Context No response

📅 Opened Mar 17, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 70/100Contribute

Feature Description In #3898 we started stripping the DWARF data from release docker images. A common practice is to release the DWARF data as an artifact so users that have a need for them can still use them. Proposed Solution We have two release "binaries" - the binary built by goreleaser (which should automatically strip DWARF data) and the docker image. Since the same Go version and dependencies are used for both builds it could be enough to modify goreleaser to publish the DWARF data as a separate artifact - however that has to be tested. Alternative Solutions No response Want to contribute? I would like to work on this issue. Additional Context No response

📅 Opened Mar 13, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more Go beginner tasks?Explore Go GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for kcp-dev/kcp

When evaluating whether to contribute to kcp-dev/kcp, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of kcp-dev/kcp acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 4 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 84.8% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to kcp-dev/kcp

01

Is kcp-dev/kcp welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

kcp-dev/kcp has a recorded first-timer success rate of 88.9%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~4 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 66.4 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 66.4 places kcp-dev/kcp in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for kcp-dev/kcp?

The external pull request merge rate is 84.8%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in kcp-dev/kcp?

Yes, kcp-dev/kcp currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for kcp-dev/kcp are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.