katanemo/plano - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Plano is an AI-native proxy server and data plane for agentic apps. Smart LLM routing, observability, agent orchestration, and guardrails so you stay focused on your agents core logic.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 56/100

External PR Merge Rate: 64%

Response Time: 10d

First Timer Success: 57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is katanemo/plano welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

katanemo/plano has a recorded first-timer success rate of 57.1%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in katanemo/plano respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 241.7 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 56.2 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 56.2 places katanemo/plano in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for katanemo/plano?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for katanemo/plano is 63.9%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in katanemo/plano?

katanemo/plano currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

katanemo
katanemo/planoA•Welcoming7.1k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
katanemo

katanemo/plano

7,081
InactiveA•Welcoming(56/100)Rust

Plano is an AI-native proxy server and data plane for agentic apps. Smart LLM routing, observability, agent orchestration, and guardrails so you stay focused on your agents core logic.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Quality Architect

Warmth Score
6.6/10
Patience Score
7.2/10
Nitpick Rate
43%

Rigorous architecture standards (66% critical review signals). Ensure PRs strictly follow guidelines before requesting review in katanemo/plano.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Verify all existing package test suites run cleanly
  • •Use conventional commit messages and clean branch names
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
10 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
63.9%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
57.1%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
5 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
63.9%
Merge Gauge
57.1%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe43/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for katanemo/plano
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/katanemo/plano)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/katanemo/plano?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

First, thank you to the Plano maintainers and contributors for building and open-sourcing this project. The existing unified endpoint and routing design is already very useful in practice. Summary According to Gemini API version docs, the API has both v1 (stable) and v1beta (early features), and Gemini SDKs default to v1beta unless api_version is explicitly changed. To improve drop-in compatibility, Plano should perhaps support these Gemini v1beta routes: POST /v1beta/models/{model}:generateContent POST /v1beta/models/{model}:streamGenerateContent These requests should be translated into Plano’s existing routing/provider pipeline so existing Gemini clients can use Plano with little to no request-format changes. Current behavior A request like: POST /v1beta/models/gemini-2.5-flash:generateContent returns 404 Not Found from Plano 0.4.9, even when Gemini model providers are configured. Expected behavior When a Gemini provider is configured, Plano should accept the above v1beta endpoin

📅 Opened Mar 4, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 30/100Contribute

Summary Plano's WASM filters hardcode 30-second timeouts on all outbound HTTP calls, making Plano unusable for agentic workloads where LLM calls with tool use regularly exceed 30 seconds — despite Plano's docs explicitly supporting agent architectures. Root Cause Four constants in crates/common/src/consts.rs: pub const ARCH_FC_REQUEST_TIMEOUT_MS: u64 = 30000; pub const DEFAULT_TARGET_REQUEST_TIMEOUT_MS: u64 = 30000; pub const API_REQUEST_TIMEOUT_MS: u64 = 30000; pub const MODEL_SERVER_REQUEST_TIMEOUT_MS: u64 = 30000; These are used in two ways: Request header — stream_context.rs and http_context.rs set x-envoy-upstream-rq-timeout-ms: 30000 on outbound calls, overriding Envoy's route-level timeout: 300s. dispatch_http_call — the WASM dispatch_http_call function is called with a Duration based on these constants, hardcoding the timeout in the WASM binary itself. The YAML listener timeout field only affects the inbound Envoy route timeout and has no effect on the WASM filter's

📅 Opened Feb 27, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 45/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for katanemo/plano

When evaluating whether to contribute to katanemo/plano, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of katanemo/plano acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 10 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 63.9% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to katanemo/plano

01

Is katanemo/plano welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

katanemo/plano has a recorded first-timer success rate of 57.1%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~10 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 56.2 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 56.2 places katanemo/plano in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for katanemo/plano?

The external pull request merge rate is 63.9%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in katanemo/plano?

Yes, katanemo/plano currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for katanemo/plano are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.