kakao/actionbase - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

One database for user-user (follows), user-item (likes), and item-item (related items) interactions — precomputed at write time, served as simple lookups

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 65/100

External PR Merge Rate: 83%

Response Time: 13h

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is kakao/actionbase welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

kakao/actionbase has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in kakao/actionbase respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 12.7 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 65.5 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 65.5 places kakao/actionbase in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for kakao/actionbase?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for kakao/actionbase is 83.3%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in kakao/actionbase?

kakao/actionbase does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

kakao
kakao/actionbaseA•Welcoming227
GitHub
Back to Explorer
kakao

kakao/actionbase

227
InactiveA•Welcoming(65/100)Kotlin

One database for user-user (follows), user-item (likes), and item-item (related items) interactions — precomputed at write time, served as simple lookups

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Architecture Gatekeeper

Warmth Score
7.2/10
Patience Score
7.8/10
Nitpick Rate
45%

Strict review standards in kakao/actionbase. Ensure PR scope matches issue requirements closely before requesting review.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
12 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
83.3%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
5 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
83.3%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe84/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for kakao/actionbase
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/kakao/actionbase)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/kakao/actionbase?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

Background The CLI was originally written in Kotlin, then converted to Go for easier distribution. We used AI for the conversion. It works, but honestly, we are not confident in Go—we do not know if the code is idiomatic or follows best practices. We need help from Go developers. If you see something wrong or weird, please tell us. The `internal/util` package has only one test file (`truncate_test.go`), which was also written by AI. Tasks Each item can be submitted as a separate PR. `util/filters.go` (12 LOC, Easy) `util/formatter.go` (~50 LOC, Easy) `util/strings.go` (~30 LOC, Easy) `util/arguments.go` (110 LOC, Medium) `util/table_printer.go` (~80 LOC, Medium) How to Contribute Comment below to claim an item Branch: `test/cli-util-` PR title: `test(cli): add tests for util/` One file per PR Run `cd cli && make test` Done When Test file at `cli/internal/util/_test.go` Public functions covered Tests pass Notes Code improvements are welcome—open a separate issue or includ

📅 Opened Jan 26, 2026💬 7 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute

Background XXHash32Wrapper class lacks direct unit tests. While it is used in other tests (EdgeIndexMapperTest, EdgeStateMapperTest, V2MultiEdgeBulkLoadTest), there are no dedicated tests that verify its core functionality. Task Add unit tests for XXHash32Wrapper class. File path: core/src/main/kotlin/com/kakao/actionbase/core/codec/XXHash32Wrapper.kt (35 LOC) Test targets: hash(bytes, offset, length) - Hash byte array with offset and length stringHash(string) - Hash string value insertTsHash / deleteTsHash - Verify constant hash values create(seed) - Factory method with custom seed Done When Test file created at core/src/test/kotlin/com/kakao/actionbase/core/codec/XXHash32WrapperTest.kt All public methods are covered with tests. Tests pass with ./gradlew :core:test. Notes Suggested test cases: hash() returns consistent value for same input hash() returns different values for different inputs stringHash() returns consistent value for same string insertTsHash and deleteTsHash ar

📅 Opened Jan 25, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute
Looking for more Kotlin beginner tasks?Explore Kotlin GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for kakao/actionbase

When evaluating whether to contribute to kakao/actionbase, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of kakao/actionbase acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 12 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 83.3% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to kakao/actionbase

01

Is kakao/actionbase welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

kakao/actionbase has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~12 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 65.5 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 65.5 places kakao/actionbase in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for kakao/actionbase?

The external pull request merge rate is 83.3%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in kakao/actionbase?

kakao/actionbase does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for kakao/actionbase are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.