jellyfin/jellyfin - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

The Free Software Media System - Server Backend & API

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 63/100

External PR Merge Rate: 51%

Response Time: 7h

First Timer Success: 55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is jellyfin/jellyfin welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

jellyfin/jellyfin has a recorded first-timer success rate of 55.1%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in jellyfin/jellyfin respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 7.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 62.8 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 62.8 places jellyfin/jellyfin in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for jellyfin/jellyfin?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for jellyfin/jellyfin is 51.2%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in jellyfin/jellyfin?

jellyfin/jellyfin currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

jellyfin
jellyfin/jellyfinA•Welcoming57.9k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
jellyfin

jellyfin/jellyfin

57,924
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(63/100)C#

The Free Software Media System - Server Backend & API

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Quality Architect

Warmth Score
6.6/10
Patience Score
7.2/10
Nitpick Rate
43%

Rigorous architecture standards (66% critical review signals). Ensure PRs strictly follow guidelines before requesting review in jellyfin/jellyfin.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Use conventional commit messages and clean branch names
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
6 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
51.2%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
55.1%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
256 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
51.2%
Merge Gauge
55.1%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe62/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for jellyfin/jellyfin
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/jellyfin/jellyfin)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/jellyfin/jellyfin?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

Description of the bug Upload a new Splashscreen in unsupported format and save other changes. Should not touch the image, but something happens (405 server code and jf-web can't access property "_sdk", r is undefined) Opened another web instance in different browser, but I can't reach the form. Reproduction steps Upload a JXL or so Upload fails (good), because it needs to be SkiaSharp readable/supported Save the form (save other changes) It changed something for image. What is the current bug behavior? 405 error from the server and SDK error in js-web What is the expected correct behavior? Only save supported formats (readable by SkiaSharp or mime-type), additionally would be best to be able to reach branding page for an update (never send 405 or make web more robust on failed response) Jellyfin Server version Master Specify commit id No response Specify unstable release number No response Specify version number No response Specify the build version Release Environment - OS: linux -

📅 Opened Aug 17, 2026💬 5 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Description of the bug Hi, I'm unsure if this is a bug or intended behavior, but the POST /Auth/Keys api endpoint doesn't return the created API key. This means we need to GET /Auth/Keys and filter by app name which is not necessarily unique. Is there a reason not to return the API key on creation? If this is intended behavior feel free to close the issue. Thanks. Reproduction steps Obtain auth token POST /Auth/Keys Nothing gets returned by the API What is the current bug behavior? Nothing get returned. What is the expected correct behavior? The created API key gets returned in the response. Jellyfin Server version 10.11.6 Specify commit id No response Specify unstable release number No response Specify version number No response Specify the build version 10.11.6 Environment - OS: Debian 13 - Linux Kernel: 6.12.57+deb13-amd64 - Virtualization: No - Clients: N/A - Browser: N/A - FFmpeg Version: N/A - Playback Method: N/A - Hardware Acceleration: N/A - CPU Model: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E

📅 Opened Feb 19, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 30/100Contribute
Looking for more C# beginner tasks?Explore C# GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for jellyfin/jellyfin

When evaluating whether to contribute to jellyfin/jellyfin, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of jellyfin/jellyfin acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 6 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 51.2% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to jellyfin/jellyfin

01

Is jellyfin/jellyfin welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

jellyfin/jellyfin has a recorded first-timer success rate of 55.1%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~6 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 62.8 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 62.8 places jellyfin/jellyfin in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for jellyfin/jellyfin?

The external pull request merge rate is 51.2%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in jellyfin/jellyfin?

Yes, jellyfin/jellyfin currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for jellyfin/jellyfin are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.