jayminwest/warren - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Run coding agents like infrastructure, not terminal sessions. Warren manages isolation, lifecycle, spend, recovery, and Git delivery on compute you control.

C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 72/100

External PR Merge Rate: 95%

Response Time: 6d

First Timer Success: 57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is jayminwest/warren welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

jayminwest/warren has a recorded first-timer success rate of 57.1%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in jayminwest/warren respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 144.3 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 72.4 C-Rank™ score (S Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 72.4 places jayminwest/warren in the S tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for jayminwest/warren?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for jayminwest/warren is 94.6%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in jayminwest/warren?

jayminwest/warren currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

jayminwest
jayminwest/warrenS•Elite480
GitHub
Back to Explorer
jayminwest

jayminwest/warren

480
Active (30d)S•Elite(72/100)TypeScript

Run coding agents like infrastructure, not terminal sessions. Warren manages isolation, lifecycle, spend, recovery, and Git delivery on compute you control.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
8.1/10
Patience Score
8.4/10
Nitpick Rate
30%

Highly welcoming maintainers in jayminwest/warren. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
6 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
94.6%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
57.1%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
5 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
94.6%
Merge Gauge
57.1%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe55/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for jayminwest/warren
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/jayminwest/warren)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/jayminwest/warren?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

The defect When warren runs in public mode (WARREN_AUTH=public), it refuses every project whose URL is not a github.com URL. This happens even when the configured forge owns the URL. A forge is the git hosting provider that warren talks to: GitHub, Azure DevOps (WARREN_FORGE=ado), or GitLab (WARREN_FORGE=gitlab, added in #1300). Public mode keeps a list of allowed repos in WARREN_PUBLIC_ALLOWLIST. The module that checks this list, src/projects/public-allowlist.ts, gets the owner and repo name from a URL with parseGitHubUrl, which accepts github.com URLs only: src/projects/public-allowlist.ts:251: assertGitUrlAllowlisted is the registration check. addProject calls it at src/projects/manage.ts:114. For a GitLab or Azure DevOps URL, parseGitHubUrl throws unrecognized GitHub URL, so POST /projects returns HTTP 400 before the allowlist is consulted. src/projects/public-allowlist.ts:229: isGitUrlAllowlisted is used by the boot check assertRegisteredProjectsAllowlisted. It catches the parse

📅 Opened Oct 8, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute

The defect The web UI (src/ui/src/, React + Tailwind v4) uses about 1,150 arbitrary-value Tailwind classes such as text-[11px] or gap-[6px], across 55 of 81 .tsx files (counted 2026-10-06; heaviest: src/ui/src/pages/telemetry/judge-tab.tsx 67, src/ui/src/pages/instance.tsx 51, src/ui/src/pages/operations/active-workloads.tsx 49). Nothing stops new ones: biome.jsonc enables no Tailwind rule, the installed Biome is 2.4.14 (package.json:105 pins ^2.4.10), and Biome's noTailwindArbitraryValue rule has no baseline mode anyway, so it cannot be switched on while 1,150 hits exist. No ratchet script exists under scripts/. Fix direction Add scripts/check-tailwind-arbitrary.ts plus a budget file scripts/tailwind-arbitrary-budgets.json: Scan src/ui/src/**/*.tsx for tokens matching /\b[a-z-]+-\[[^\]]+\]/. Do not count the CSS-variable form text-(--color-info) (it uses parentheses, see src/ui/src/pages/runs/runs-table.tsx:27) or data-[...] variants. Compare per-file counts with the budget. Fail whe

📅 Opened Oct 6, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

The defect Acceptance (nightly) has never been green. It has run 39 times since its first run on 2026-07-31, and 38 of those failed. The one that did not fail was cancelled. No run has ever reported a passing suite. The last cron run (34096324912, 2026-09-07) reports 2 passed, 21 failed, 1 skipped. Only scenarios 01 and 11 pass, which are the two that never call POST /projects. Twenty of the 21 failures are the same 503: POST /projects: expected status 201, got 503: {"error":{"code":"sandbox_git_preflight","message":"sandbox git preflight failed: /usr/bin/git does not execute inside the sandbox: bwrap: loopback: Failed RTM_NEWADDR: Operation not permitted", ...}} src/sandbox/bwrap.ts:71 always emits --unshare-all, so every sandboxed command asks bwrap for a fresh network namespace, and bwrap brings up lo inside it. That last part needs CAP_NET_ADMIN over the new namespace, and on this runner it is denied. The header comment on the workflow explains the runner choice as: "The runner al

📅 Opened Sep 7, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute

The gap Between a turn starting and a turn ending, warren is blind. It cannot tell a model that is thinking from one that has stalled, and it cannot tell useful output from a reasoning stream that has degenerated into whitespace until the provider's length cap ends the turn. Two production incidents in one week: A pi run on OpenRouter sat idle for 45 minutes inside one turn and burned $2.38 before the heartbeat watchdog fired. A glm-5.3-flash model produced whitespace-only reasoning deltas until the length cap, on five runs in a row, each paid for in full. Why warren cannot see either: The event bridge receives every streamed delta but drops the per-delta types before persisting them. src/runs/stream/bridge.ts:206-209 continues on isPerDeltaNoiseEvent, and :454 lists message_update, tool_execution_update, and message_start as that set. The rationale at :418-424 is sound (persisting them flooded the event table), but no inspection happens before the drop. The watchdog anchors on the

📅 Opened Sep 4, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute

The gap When a run's work is rescued to a warren/rescue/<runId> branch after the agent failed to land it, nothing tells the operator the rescue exists and nothing lets them dispatch a follow-up run from it. Today the recovery is a hand sequence: find the run id, guess the branch name, fetch it, check it out, dispatch a new run, and paste the original prompt. What exists: src/runtime/salvage.ts:41-44 defines RESCUE_BRANCH_PREFIX = "warren/rescue/" and rescueBranchFor(runId). The reap path stamps salvageRef and salvagePath onto the run row (src/runs/reap/run.ts:298-311, and the pod-posted arm at :262-268). The wire type carries both fields to the UI (src/ui/src/api/types.ts:178-180). What does not: No page under src/ui/src/pages/ and no command under src/cli/commands/ renders salvageRef or salvagePath (the only hits are null values in test fixtures). POST /runs (src/server/handlers/runs/dispatch.ts:98-130) accepts continueFromRunId, cloneFromRunId, and existingBranch, but has no field

📅 Opened Sep 4, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more TypeScript beginner tasks?Explore TypeScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for jayminwest/warren

When evaluating whether to contribute to jayminwest/warren, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of jayminwest/warren acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 6 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 94.6% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to jayminwest/warren

01

Is jayminwest/warren welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

jayminwest/warren has a recorded first-timer success rate of 57.1%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~6 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 72.4 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 72.4 places jayminwest/warren in the Elite tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for jayminwest/warren?

The external pull request merge rate is 94.6%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in jayminwest/warren?

Yes, jayminwest/warren currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for jayminwest/warren are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.