jaylfc/taOS - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Self-hosted AI agent OS. Your memory, chat, agents, and files stay on hardware you own, offline by default, cloud by choice. Offline AI memory (taOSmd), self-hosted multi-framework group chat, a full web desktop + app store, and auto-clustering across the consumer hardware you already have (Orange/Raspberry Pi, Mac mini, gaming PC).

C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 72/100

External PR Merge Rate: 83%

Response Time: 5d

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is jaylfc/taOS welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

jaylfc/taOS has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in jaylfc/taOS respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 121.3 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 71.7 C-Rank™ score (S Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 71.7 places jaylfc/taOS in the S tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for jaylfc/taOS?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for jaylfc/taOS is 83.4%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in jaylfc/taOS?

jaylfc/taOS currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

jaylfc
jaylfc/taOSS•Elite552
GitHub
Back to Explorer
jaylfc

jaylfc/taOS

552
Active (30d)S•Elite(72/100)Python

Self-hosted AI agent OS. Your memory, chat, agents, and files stay on hardware you own, offline by default, cloud by choice. Offline AI memory (taOSmd), self-hosted multi-framework group chat, a full web desktop + app store, and auto-clustering across the consumer hardware you already have (Orange/Raspberry Pi, Mac mini, gaming PC).

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Architecture Gatekeeper

Warmth Score
7.6/10
Patience Score
8.0/10
Nitpick Rate
45%

Strict review standards in jaylfc/taOS. Ensure PR scope matches issue requirements closely before requesting review.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
5 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
83.4%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
6 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
83.4%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe63/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for jaylfc/taOS
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/jaylfc/taOS)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/jaylfc/taOS?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (3)

View on GitHub

Two MINOR findings from CodeRabbit on #2097 (merged clean; these are non-blocking polish): Broken thumbnail fails silently (LibraryItemCard.tsx). When a thumbnail artifact exists but the image fails to load, onError hides the <img>, leaving blank space. Prefer showing the same placeholder used when no thumbnail exists. source option declared but never sent (lib/library.ts). IngestLibraryOptions.source is defined but not serialized into the request body. Either wire it into the POST body or drop the option. Good first task for a fleet lane.

📅 Opened Jul 22, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

S7 Ready to Test Checklist (Hailo-10H Backend) This is the checklist for the community tester to verify the Hailo-10H NPU backend integration. Please execute these steps and provide feedback. Prerequisite You must have: Raspberry Pi 5 with AI HAT+2 (Hailo-10H, 40 TOPS) HailoRT + hailo-genai installed and working All slices S1-S6 installed and in place 1. Install the new Hailo backend # from anywhere, no checkout needed (recommended) curl -sSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jaylfc/taOS/master/scripts/install-hailo.sh \ | TAOS_HAILO_SETUP=1 sudo bash # or, if you have a taOS checkout, cd into it FIRST (the path is repo-relative) cd /opt/taos sudo TAOS_HAILO_SETUP=1 bash scripts/install-hailo.sh Please paste the complete banner + summary output. 2. Verify service is running systemctl status hailo-ollama curl -s http://localhost:7836/api/tags Run each of the two commands above on its OWN line (do not paste the prose with them). Confirm: service shows "active" and the curl output sh

📅 Opened Jul 10, 2026💬 47 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute

Background security review (MEDIUM). is_safe_public_url (tinyagentos/userspace/url_guard.py) resolves + validates a hostname's IPs, but install_app then re-resolves the hostname when httpx connects, leaving a DNS-rebinding / TOCTOU window where the connected IP can differ from the validated one (and bounce to an internal address). Fix Resolve once in is_safe_public_url, return the validated IP(s), and pin the httpx connection to that IP (a custom transport / pinned resolver) while preserving the original Host header and SNI for TLS. Scheduling This lives in install_app's source_url fetch, which the P2 distribution phase rebuilds into a proper download broker (signed-bundle fetch + sha256 + signature + min_os verification). The DNS-pinned fetch belongs there, so it is folded into P2 rather than fixed in isolation, and to avoid colliding with the in-flight P3b branch that edits the same install_app function. Note: is_safe_public_url already blocks the obvious case (private / loopback / r

📅 Opened Jun 17, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for jaylfc/taOS

When evaluating whether to contribute to jaylfc/taOS, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of jaylfc/taOS acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 5 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 83.4% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to jaylfc/taOS

01

Is jaylfc/taOS welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

jaylfc/taOS has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~5 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 71.7 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 71.7 places jaylfc/taOS in the Elite tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for jaylfc/taOS?

The external pull request merge rate is 83.4%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in jaylfc/taOS?

Yes, jaylfc/taOS currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for jaylfc/taOS are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.