jank-lang/jank - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

jank is the native Clojure dialect with seamless C++ interop.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 66/100

External PR Merge Rate: 87%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is jank-lang/jank welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

jank-lang/jank has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in jank-lang/jank respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 66.3 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 66.3 places jank-lang/jank in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for jank-lang/jank?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for jank-lang/jank is 86.6%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in jank-lang/jank?

jank-lang/jank currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

jank-lang
jank-lang/jankA•Welcoming3.3k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
jank-lang

jank-lang/jank

3,338
InactiveA•Welcoming(66/100)C++

jank is the native Clojure dialect with seamless C++ interop.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
8.5/10
Patience Score
8.6/10
Nitpick Rate
30%

Highly welcoming maintainers in jank-lang/jank. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
86.6%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
8 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
86.6%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe65/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for jank-lang/jank
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/jank-lang/jank)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/jank-lang/jank?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

Clojure doesn't allow either of these: ❯ clj Clojure 1.12.4 user=> (let [.-foo 3] (println .-foo)) Syntax error (ClassFormatError) compiling fn* at (REPL:1:1). Illegal field name "._foo" in class user$eval134 user=> (let [.foo 3] (println .foo)) Syntax error (ClassFormatError) compiling fn* at (REPL:1:1). Illegal field name ".foo" in class user$eval136 We should do the same. Right now, we allow them during analysis and then fail during codegen, since we're not expecting . in any symbols and we don't munge that character. We shouldn't need to fix the munging if we prevent this during analysis anyway. These member symbols can only be used in call position. Looks like we do this in some cases, but not others. user=> (println .-foo) ─ analyze/invalid-cpp-position ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── error: Unable to

📅 Opened Feb 9, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 80/100Contribute

jank health check ─ system ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── ─ ✅ operating system: macos ─ ✅ default triple: arm64-apple-darwin24.6.0 ─ jank install ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── ─ ✅ jank version: jank-0.1-alpha ─ ⚠️ jank assertions are enabled; performance will be impacted ─ ✅ jank resource dir: ../lib/jank/0.1 ─ ✅ jank resolved resource dir: /Users/emma/programming/jank/compiler+runtime/build/../lib/jank/0.1 (ignored for dev build) ─ ✅ jank user cache dir: /Users/emma/.cache/jank/arm64-apple-d

📅 Opened Jan 18, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute
Looking for more C++ beginner tasks?Explore C++ GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for jank-lang/jank

When evaluating whether to contribute to jank-lang/jank, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of jank-lang/jank acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 86.6% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to jank-lang/jank

01

Is jank-lang/jank welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

jank-lang/jank has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 66.3 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 66.3 places jank-lang/jank in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for jank-lang/jank?

The external pull request merge rate is 86.6%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in jank-lang/jank?

Yes, jank-lang/jank currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for jank-lang/jank are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.