ionide/FsAutoComplete - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

F# language server using Language Server Protocol

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 49/100

External PR Merge Rate: 100%

Response Time: 16d

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is ionide/FsAutoComplete welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

ionide/FsAutoComplete has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in ionide/FsAutoComplete respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 381.1 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 48.8 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 48.8 places ionide/FsAutoComplete in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for ionide/FsAutoComplete?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for ionide/FsAutoComplete is 100.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in ionide/FsAutoComplete?

ionide/FsAutoComplete currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

ionide
ionide/FsAutoCompleteB•Solid487
GitHub
Back to Explorer
ionide

ionide/FsAutoComplete

487
Active (30d)B•Solid(49/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)F#F#

F# language server using Language Server Protocol

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Architecture Gatekeeper

Warmth Score
7.2/10
Patience Score
8.0/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Strict review standards in ionide/FsAutoComplete. Ensure PR scope matches issue requirements closely before requesting review.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in ionide/FsAutoComplete focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add or update tests for changed behavior before requesting review
  • •Keep PRs small and focused on one change
  • •Run the repository formatter and linter locally

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not leave requested test coverage unresolved
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors with feature work
  • •Do not submit formatting-only noise with feature changes
Response Velocity
15 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
100.0%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
2 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
100.0%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe40/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for ionide/FsAutoComplete
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/ionide/FsAutoComplete)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/ionide/FsAutoComplete?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

Details I am building a non-IDE semantic client on top of FsAutoComplete. Existing FSAC primitives such as definition, references, workspace symbols, and diagnostics are already useful, but higher-level navigation would make F# codebases much easier to explore from LSP clients and coding agents. The two missing capabilities I would like to request are standard LSP-style support for: textDocument/implementation callHierarchy/prepare, callHierarchy/incomingCalls, and callHierarchy/outgoingCalls Desired behavior textDocument/implementation For F# symbols, return implementing locations for cases such as: interface type -> implementing types interface member -> concrete member implementations abstract member -> overrides/implementations Results should use the same URI/range conventions as existing FSAC definition/references responses. callHierarchy/* For F# functions and members, support: prepare call hierarchy item at a position incoming calls: callers grouped by enclosing function/me

📅 Opened May 3, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute
Looking for more F# beginner tasks?Explore F# GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for ionide/FsAutoComplete

When evaluating whether to contribute to ionide/FsAutoComplete, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of ionide/FsAutoComplete acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 15 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 100.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to ionide/FsAutoComplete

01

Is ionide/FsAutoComplete welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

ionide/FsAutoComplete has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~15 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 48.8 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 48.8 places ionide/FsAutoComplete in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for ionide/FsAutoComplete?

The external pull request merge rate is 100.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in ionide/FsAutoComplete?

Yes, ionide/FsAutoComplete currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for ionide/FsAutoComplete are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.