iflytek/astron-agent - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Enterprise-grade, commercial-friendly agentic workflow platform for building next-generation SuperAgents.

C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 74/100

External PR Merge Rate: 88%

Response Time: 23h

First Timer Success: 65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is iflytek/astron-agent welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

iflytek/astron-agent has a recorded first-timer success rate of 65.0%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in iflytek/astron-agent respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 22.6 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 73.7 C-Rank™ score (S Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 73.7 places iflytek/astron-agent in the S tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for iflytek/astron-agent?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for iflytek/astron-agent is 88.1%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in iflytek/astron-agent?

iflytek/astron-agent currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

iflytek
iflytek/astron-agentSElite8.9k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
iflytek

iflytek/astron-agent

8,906
SElite(74/100)Java

Enterprise-grade, commercial-friendly agentic workflow platform for building next-generation SuperAgents.

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Architecture Gatekeeper

Warmth Score
7.2/10
Patience Score
8.0/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Strict review standards in iflytek/astron-agent. Ensure PR scope matches issue requirements closely before requesting review.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
22 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
88.1%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
65.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
17 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
88.1%
Merge Gauge
65.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe68/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for iflytek/astron-agent
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/iflytek/astron-agent)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/iflytek/astron-agent?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Summary I'd like to propose adding Langfuse integration to astron-agent, so users get built-in observability, tracing, evaluation, and cost monitoring for their agentic workflows. Background astron-agent is an enterprise-grade, commercial-friendly agentic workflow platform for building next-generation SuperAgents (now part of the CNCF Landscape 🎉). As multi-agent workflows become more complex in production, operators need deep visibility into every LLM call, tool invocation, retrieval step, and inter-agent handoff. Langfuse is the leading open-source LLM engineering platform. It provides: Hierarchical tracing — capture every LLM call, tool use, retrieval, and agent step in a nested trace view. Cost & latency monitoring — track token usage, per-model costs, and end-to-end latency over time. Evaluation framework — run model-based evaluations (LLM-as-a-judge), custom scoring, and user feedback on traces. Prompt management — version, deploy, and compare prompts centrally. Data

📅 Opened Jul 27, 2026💬 8 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Expand the documentation FAQ 📖 The FAQ pages — docs/faq.md (English) and docs/zh/faq.md (中文) — are a high-traffic landing spot for new users. Help us grow them with real questions people hit. What to do Pick one or two common questions — good sources are Discussions, recently closed issues, or anything that tripped you up during setup. Add a clear question + answer to docs/faq.md (English). Mirror the same entry in docs/zh/faq.md (中文) at the same position. Only comfortable in one language? Add that one and say so in your PR — someone can add the other. Preview locally: cd docs && npm run docs:dev Good candidates Common deployment / environment-variable pitfalls "Which model do I need and where do I put the credentials?" How to import a workflow from the examples gallery Differences between the deployment guide variants (with/without auth, with RPA) Small, self-contained, and genuinely useful — a perfect first PR. Tip: every page has an "Edit this page on GitHu

📅 Opened Jun 15, 2026💬 5 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Show preview.png thumbnails in the examples gallery 🖼️ The examples gallery currently renders text-only cards. The example spec already reserves an optional preview.png per example — let's render it so cards get a screenshot of the workflow canvas or its output. Scope Gallery component — update docs/.vitepress/theme/ExamplesGallery.vue to show a thumbnail when the example has a preview.png, with a graceful text-only fallback when it doesn't. Data loader — update docs/.vitepress/examples.data.ts to expose whether each example has a preview.png and a URL the page can load (e.g. the GitHub raw URL …/raw/main/examples/<id>/preview.png). Seed screenshots — add a preview.png to the three existing seed examples (history-knowledge-qa, ai-radio-podcast, english-essay-corrector). Verify cd docs && DOCS_BASE=/astron-agent/ npm run docs:build Confirm cards with a preview.png show the image and cards without one still render cleanly. Good for someone comfortable with a bit of Vue +

📅 Opened Jun 15, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Contribute a workflow example 🧩 The community examples gallery showcases reusable Astron Agent workflows that anyone can import and adapt. Adding one is a great first contribution — and you'll show up as a project contributor. What you need A workflow you've built in Astron Agent that does something useful Its exported DSL (workflow.yml) Steps Copy the template: cp -r examples/TEMPLATE examples/<your-example-id> Drop in your exported workflow.yml. Fill in README.md (frontmatter + description) — see examples/README.md for the field list. Scrub secrets ⚠️ — exported DSL can embed API keys / app ids / tokens. Replace them with YOUR_* placeholders. (CI checks this automatically.) Open a PR. The Examples Lint check validates your frontmatter and scans for secrets. Prefer a guided submission without using Git? Use the 🧩 Submit a Workflow Example issue form instead. Not sure what to build? Browse the existing examples for inspiration — translators, summarizers, content g

📅 Opened Jun 15, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute

Help translate the Astron Agent docs 🌏 Our documentation site now uses a standard VitePress i18n layout: English is the default at the root, and each language mirrors it under its own folder (Simplified Chinese already lives under docs/zh/). Adding a language is one of the highest-impact, lowest-barrier ways to contribute — and you'll show up as a project contributor. We're looking for translators for: 🇯🇵 Japanese (ja) 🇰🇷 Korean (ko) 🇪🇸 Spanish (es) 🇫🇷 French (fr) …or propose another language you can maintain. How it works Each language is a folder under docs/ that mirrors the English pages with identical relative paths (e.g. docs/ja/guide/quick-start.md mirrors docs/guide/quick-start.md). The full workflow — running the site locally, where pages go, and how to register a new locale — is in the Contribute to the Docs guide. To get involved Comment below with the language you'd like to work on (and, if you want, which page you'll start with) so we d

📅 Opened Jun 15, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more Java beginner tasks?Explore Java GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for iflytek/astron-agent

When evaluating whether to contribute to iflytek/astron-agent, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of iflytek/astron-agent acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 22 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 88.1% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to iflytek/astron-agent

01

Is iflytek/astron-agent welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

iflytek/astron-agent has a recorded first-timer success rate of 65.0%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~22 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 73.7 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 73.7 places iflytek/astron-agent in the Elite tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for iflytek/astron-agent?

The external pull request merge rate is 88.1%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in iflytek/astron-agent?

Yes, iflytek/astron-agent currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for iflytek/astron-agent are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.

iflytek/astron-agent • 73.7/100 C-Rank (S-Tier) | GetMerged