iUnreallx/ReDrive - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Open-source OBD2 dashboard app for real-time car data and diagnostics.

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 54/100

External PR Merge Rate: 67%

Response Time: 17d

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is iUnreallx/ReDrive welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

iUnreallx/ReDrive has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in iUnreallx/ReDrive respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 400.8 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 53.9 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 53.9 places iUnreallx/ReDrive in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for iUnreallx/ReDrive?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for iUnreallx/ReDrive is 66.7%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in iUnreallx/ReDrive?

iUnreallx/ReDrive currently has 10 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

iUnreallx
iUnreallx/ReDriveB•Solid132
GitHub
Back to Explorer
iUnreallx

iUnreallx/ReDrive

132
InactiveB•Solid(54/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)Dart

Open-source OBD2 dashboard app for real-time car data and diagnostics.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
8.8/10
Patience Score
8.8/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Highly welcoming maintainers in iUnreallx/ReDrive. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
16 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
66.7%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
1 core
Single maintainer review bottleneck
Diagnostic Health HUD
66.7%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe57/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for iUnreallx/ReDrive
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/iUnreallx/ReDrive)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/iUnreallx/ReDrive?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Problem Current initialization logic relies on fixed Future.delayed calls and skips several critical ELM327 configuration commands. This works against a perfect C++ emulator but will break on real hardware with varying response times, cheap adapters, or different Bluetooth stack latencies. What's wrong specifically Future.delayed with hardcoded durations instead of waiting for actual adapter responses Missing ATS0 — spaces not explicitly disabled in responses Missing ATH0 — headers not explicitly disabled, parser relies on clean emulator output ATSP0 treated as if it completes protocol selection, when real initialization happens only on first OBD request like 0100 No extended timeout for the 0100 command that actually triggers bus initialization What needs to happen Remove all Future.delayed calls from initialization Implement proper response-based waiting in _sendAndWait Add explicit formatting configuration commands early in the sequence Move ATSP0 before the first real OBD reque

📅 Opened May 4, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

Goal: Split ObdProvider into focused OBD core modules. Scope: Extract ElmClient Extract ElmCommandQueue Extract ELM response/error parser Extract PID decoder Extract polling controller Keep ObdProvider as UI-facing state layer only Out of scope: ECU recovery logic multi-ECU transport reconnect Wi-Fi

📅 Opened May 4, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 55/100Contribute

Goal Implement a unified logging service that writes timestamped, tagged messages to a rotating file. The system will capture OBD commands, responses, transport events, and recovery attempts, enabling offline debugging of real‑world issues without a debugger attached. Motivation Currently, all communication with the ELM327 is invisible to the developer once the device is disconnected from the IDE. To diagnose problems like "zero data after re‑connection" or "adapter silence on third attempt", we need a persistent log of every command, response, timeout, and state transition. A built‑in log viewer in the settings screen will allow users to share logs directly from the app, making bug reports much more actionable. Sub‑tasks (each must be a separate PR) Logger service with file output and rotation Focus: infrastructure, no UI changes. Scope: Create LoggerService (singleton, pure Dart, no Flutter UI dependency). Accept messages with levels: debug, info, warning, error, elmtrace (f

📅 Opened May 3, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

Create a visual mockup for the Diagnostic Trouble Codes (DTC) screen, where users view and manage their car's fault codes. What we need: A static design proposal in PNG format (or a link to Figma/Penpot) showing the DTC screen. The screen should include: A list of current fault codes (e.g., P0301, P0420), each with code identifier and a short description. An indicator of code status (stored / pending / permanent), maybe color-coded. A "Clear codes" button or action. Some way to distinguish active vs historical codes (optional but appreciated). Style: consistent with the dark, modern automotive theme of the app (reference the dashboard concept if available). Information should be readable at a glance, possibly with color-coded severity levels (red = critical, yellow = warning). What we don't need (for this issue): No Flutter code or implementation. Purely visual concept. Not a final, pixel-perfect design – a high-quality mockup is enough. No need to provide the description database (t

📅 Opened May 3, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

Add basic support for multi-ECU environments by extending the data model and parser to handle CAN headers, without changing current behavior. Scope: Add optional sourceEcuId (int?) field to ObdData model, defaulting to null. Update _parseResponse to detect a 3‑byte CAN header (e.g. 7E8) at the beginning of a response when the ELM327 is in headers‑on mode (AT H1). If a header is found, extract it and set sourceEcuId; otherwise leave as null. No functional changes to polling, ECU selection, or handshake logic. Purely infrastructure preparation. Why: The current parser ignores CAN headers, which will cause data mix‑ups once multiple ECUs respond (engine, transmission, etc.). Adding sourceEcuId now makes the model ready for the upcoming ElmClient refactor, where AT H1 will be used and multi‑ECU filtering will be implemented. Completely backward‑compatible – nothing breaks. Out of scope: Enabling AT H1 or any multi‑ECU selection/filtering logic.

📅 Opened May 3, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more Dart beginner tasks?Explore Dart GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for iUnreallx/ReDrive

When evaluating whether to contribute to iUnreallx/ReDrive, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of iUnreallx/ReDrive acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 16 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 66.7% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to iUnreallx/ReDrive

01

Is iUnreallx/ReDrive welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

iUnreallx/ReDrive has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~16 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 53.9 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 53.9 places iUnreallx/ReDrive in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for iUnreallx/ReDrive?

The external pull request merge rate is 66.7%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in iUnreallx/ReDrive?

Yes, iUnreallx/ReDrive currently has 10 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for iUnreallx/ReDrive are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.