hyperledger-cello/cello - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Operating System for Enterprise Blockchain

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 58/100

External PR Merge Rate: 62%

Response Time: 3d

First Timer Success: 40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is hyperledger-cello/cello welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

hyperledger-cello/cello has a recorded first-timer success rate of 40.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in hyperledger-cello/cello respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 75.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 58.3 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 58.3 places hyperledger-cello/cello in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for hyperledger-cello/cello?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for hyperledger-cello/cello is 61.7%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in hyperledger-cello/cello?

hyperledger-cello/cello currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

hyperledger-cello
hyperledger-cello/celloA•Welcoming919
GitHub
Back to Explorer
hyperledger-cello

hyperledger-cello/cello

919
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(58/100)Python

Operating System for Enterprise Blockchain

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.9/10
Patience Score
8.4/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Highly welcoming maintainers in hyperledger-cello/cello. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in hyperledger-cello/cello focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Call out API, migration, or compatibility impact clearly
  • •Update docs or README when behavior changes
  • •Keep PRs small and focused on one change

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not hide breaking changes in implementation details
  • •Do not ship user-facing changes without matching docs
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors with feature work
Response Velocity
3 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
61.7%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
40.0%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
3 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
61.7%
Merge Gauge
40.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe37/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for hyperledger-cello/cello
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/hyperledger-cello/cello)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/hyperledger-cello/cello?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (4)

View on GitHub
📅 Opened Apr 22, 2026💬 10 comments
Quality: 10/100Contribute

Add a chaincode organizational mutual. Prevent organizational members from operating simultaneously while allow other organizations manage their own chaincode.

📅 Opened Apr 22, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 15/100Contribute

Integration with the Application Gateway is added in #735. Now the only thing left to do is to implement the UI to interact with it.

📅 Opened Apr 22, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 15/100Contribute

Rewrite the Makefile because the current one doesn't fit the new docker files anymore. Update the deployment command in the Makefile, or alternatively have users run Docker commands directly. I prefer the latter, as it reduces maintenance overhead while giving users greater control.

📅 Opened Apr 22, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 15/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for hyperledger-cello/cello

When evaluating whether to contribute to hyperledger-cello/cello, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of hyperledger-cello/cello acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 3 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 61.7% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to hyperledger-cello/cello

01

Is hyperledger-cello/cello welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

hyperledger-cello/cello has a recorded first-timer success rate of 40.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~3 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 58.3 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 58.3 places hyperledger-cello/cello in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for hyperledger-cello/cello?

The external pull request merge rate is 61.7%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in hyperledger-cello/cello?

Yes, hyperledger-cello/cello currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for hyperledger-cello/cello are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.